ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2409

Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator’s Global Assessment―Revised (CLA-IGA-R) Content Validity: Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) Patient Qualitative Study

Joseph F Merola1, Weihong Yang2, Qianyun Li2, Helen Doll3, Jason Randall3, Catherine Barbey4 and Feng Zeng2, 1Department of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Biogen, Cambridge, MA, 3Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Folkestone, Kent, United Kingdom, 4Biogen, Baar, Switzerland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Cutaneous, Dermatology, Disease Activity, Qualitative Research

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2377–2436) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator’s Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) is an emerging clinician-reported outcome measure for severity of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) disease activity, developed with clinician input. It consists of three separate items (‘Erythema’, ‘Other morphologic characteristics’ [edema, scale, and secondary change], and ‘Follicular activity’).1 Qualitative interviews with patients are an important step in assessing the content validity of a measure. The objectives of this concept elicitation study were to qualitatively explore the lived experience of the condition from the patient’s perspective and to confirm whether all key signs experienced by patients with CLE are captured by the CLA-IGA-R.

Methods: In total, 15 US participants with a clinical diagnosis of CLE were invited to take part in a qualitative, semi-structured, face-to-face interview. The interview lasted approximately 60 minutes and focused on spontaneously reported signs, symptoms, and impacts of CLE. Key topics not spontaneously discussed were then probed by the interviewer. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; transcripts were then coded and subjected to thematic analysis by two independent researchers. Saturation analysis was performed by dividing the 15 participants into three equal sets.

Results: Participants had an average age of 43.8 (range 24–59) years. They included Black/African American (53.3%; n=8), White (26.6%; n=4), Asian/Asian American (6.6%; n=1), and multiracial (13.3%; n=2) individuals, and most were non-Hispanic (73.3%; n=11). Most were women (86.7%; n=13). Half of the participants had been diagnosed with CLE for at least 10 years, and most reported mild or moderate CLE symptom severity. Six participants had a diagnosis of subacute CLE (SCLE) and eight were diagnosed with chronic CLE (CCLE), including five with discoid lupus.Red, pink, or purple skin (erythema) was discussed by all 15 participants; 13 reported this spontaneously (Table 1). Erythema was described as typically being the first sign of a lupus rash, which was then shortly followed by dry, ashy, or scaly skin (scale: n=13; mentioned spontaneously by 9 participants); this was sometimes followed by swelling, swollen, or bumpy skin (edema) (n=12). Open wounds (n=11) and skin crusting/scabbing (n=8) were associated with more severe rashes and typically occurred at the end of the rash. Little blisters were reported by less than half of participants (n=6). Participants also reported experiencing both current and previous hair loss on the scalp due to CLE (n=14). Saturation was supported as no skin-related lupus signs were introduced within the last group of interviews.

Conclusion: The findings from this qualitative analysis reveal the participants with CLE experienced a wide range of skin-related lupus signs. The key signs and symptoms experienced by participants (erythema, scale, edema, open wounds, crusting, and hair loss [hair loss is the downstream effect of follicular activity]) are captured in the CLA-IGA-R. These data support the content validity of the CLA-IGA-R, and thus its use as a measure of CLE disease activity. 1. Guo LN, et al. Lupus Sci Med 2021;8:e000529

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: J. Merola: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, LEO Pharma, 2, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi-Regeneron, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 2, 5; W. Yang: Biogen, 3, 12, may hold Biogen stock; Q. Li: Biogen, 3, 12, may hold Biogen stock; H. Doll: Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 3; J. Randall: Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 3; C. Barbey: Biogen, 3, 12, may hold Biogen stock; F. Zeng: Biogen, 3, 12, may hold Biogen stock.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merola J, Yang W, Li Q, Doll H, Randall J, Barbey C, Zeng F. Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator’s Global Assessment―Revised (CLA-IGA-R) Content Validity: Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) Patient Qualitative Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cutaneous-lupus-activity-investigators-global-assessment%e2%80%95revised-cla-iga-r-content-validity-cutaneous-lupus-erythematosus-cle-patient-qualitative-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cutaneous-lupus-activity-investigators-global-assessment%e2%80%95revised-cla-iga-r-content-validity-cutaneous-lupus-erythematosus-cle-patient-qualitative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology