ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1230

Curcumin: Prevalence and Perceived Efficacy in the Treatment of Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis

Neha Bhaskar1, Lilian Otalora Rojas2, Tara Jehu1, Shazia Beg1 and Neha Bhanusali1, 1University of Central Florida College of Medicine, orlando, 2University of Central Florida HCA Healthcare GME, Orlando

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: pain, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Surveys, Therapy, alternative

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: PROs, Biomarkers, Systemic Inflammation & Radiographs

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ancient Eastern medicine has valued the Curcuma longa (turmeric) plant for its powerful medicinal properties. Curcumin is suggested to possess potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticarcinogenic, and anticoagulant properties. There is currently no research relating symptom exacerbation or alleviation with curcumin therapy in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). The focus of this study is on determining the prevalence and perceived efficacy of curcumin in RA and PsA populations.

Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study of patients with active RA and PsA who visited a rheumatology outpatient clinic from October 2019 to March 2020. We used a voluntary, brief and anonymous Qualtrics survey questionnaire of concrete questions regarding curcumin use, source, form, method, and dosage, as well as patient perceptions of efficacy and any experienced side effects. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 291 patients were included. 84.9% RA, 5.1% PsA. 82.3% women and 17.7% men. 37.2% of patients reported having taken curcumin supplementation. No statistical differences between demographics (age, gender and diagnosis) were found in patients taking vs not taking curcumin. The majority of patients sourced the curcumin from a local store (54.3%), supplemented once a day (53.4%) in the form of capsules (59.2%), and took either 0-200 mg/day or 200-500 mg/day of Curcumin. Amongst those who chose not to supplement, the majority of patients reported potential side effects as being the main deterrent to supplementation.

Pain scores were significantly decreased after curcumin therapy was started (P < 0.0001). Patients who were taking curcumin for years perceived improvement of symptoms (pain, swelling, stiffness, and fatigue) and better symptomatic control when compared with patients taking it for months (P 0.01), weeks (P 0.02) or days (P 0.02). There was a significant difference in symptom improvement in patients taking 200 to 1000 mg when compared with patients taking < 200 mg (P 0.01). Patients taking curcumin once or twice daily reported significant symptom improvement when compared with patients taking it rarely. Symptomatic improvement was reported as follows: pain (35.7%), swelling (25%), stiffness (23.21%) and fatigue (16.07%).

Conclusion: Patients with RA and PsA who were taking curcumin in the study population perceived associated improvement in pain and other symptoms. There is an interesting association between perception of symptomatic improvement in patients taking curcumin and treatment’s frequency, dosages (200-1000mg), and length (years). These result suggest curcumin’s efficacy for symptom alleviation in patients with RA and PsA.  

Statistically Significant difference between patient pain perception (scores from 1 to 10) reported before vs after Curcumin therapy. Paired t test (P < 0.0001 r2 0.36).


Disclosure: N. Bhaskar, None; L. Otalora Rojas, None; T. Jehu, None; S. Beg, None; N. Bhanusali, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bhaskar N, Otalora Rojas L, Jehu T, Beg S, Bhanusali N. Curcumin: Prevalence and Perceived Efficacy in the Treatment of Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/curcumin-prevalence-and-perceived-efficacy-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-and-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/curcumin-prevalence-and-perceived-efficacy-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-and-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology