ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0153

Counseling on Safe Driving Strategies in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Anna Falls1, Peta-Gay Ricketts1, John Elliott1 and Kim Jordan1, 1OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Assistive devices, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: RA, Spondyloarthritis, & OA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cause functional impairments that impact daily life activities, including automobile driving. Radiographic presence of OA on knee and hip imaging significantly affects braking response time, and use of vehicle adaptations is common in patients with RA. There is little information on the correlation of functional disability scores, particularly the HAQ-DI score, with driving impairment in OA and/or RA patients. Limited studies suggested that an HAQ-DI score ≥ 1 correlated to driving difficulty, but driving difficulties were also present in those with lower scores. Only three studies from Canada and Europe reported rates of physician counseling on driving difficulties (0-8%) in surveyed patients with RA. Rates of physician counseling on driving safety in OA and/or RA patients in the United States are unknown. Our study aims to address these information gaps by surveying patients with OA and/or RA on functional disability (HAQ-DI), driving habits and limitations, use of vehicle modifications, and whether counseling about driving safety by a healthcare professional has occurred. We hypothesize low rates of physician driving counseling, but suspect that patients with HAQ-DI scores ≥ 1 will have higher rates of counseling and vehicle modifications.

Methods: Participants were recruited and surveyed through the ResearchMatch Network, a national web-based recruitment tool maintained at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. A total of 4,435 patients with OA and/or RA were recruited; 304 (6.9%) respondents met screening criteria (held current US driver’s license and were at least 18 years old) and completed the electronic HAQ-DI and study specific survey. Data was dichotomized with HAQ-DI ≥ 1 as a cut point and was analyzed using chi-squared analysis.

Results: Of the 304 completed surveys, 17.1% were male, 82.2% female, and 0.7% other; 65.1% reported OA, 16.8% RA and 18.1% both.  The HAQ-DI score was ≥ 1 in 60.5%. Respondents with HAQ-DI ≥ 1 reported driving fewer miles each day that those with HAQ-DI ≤ 1 (p = 0.001), and greater level of difficulty with seven areas of driving activities (p ≤ 0.020 for each activity). Physicians inquired about driving safety in 6.3% and other healthcare providers inquired in 8.6% respondents, with no significant differences based on HAQ-DI scores. Respondents with HAQ-DI ≥ 1 more frequently made the following vehicle modifications: seat supports (26.1% vs 10.8%; p = 0.001), extra mirrors (10.9% vs 3.3%; p = 0.017), and padded steering wheels (25% vs 5%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Survey respondents with HAQ-DI ≥ 1 indicated significant disability and impairment with driving related activities and were more likely to report vehicular assistive modifications. Despite this, physician and other healthcare provider rates of driving counseling remain low. Increased physician inquiry into driving safety is needed in patients with OA and RA.  An HAQ-DI ≥ 1 could be considered as a screening tool to determine which patients may need more immediate counseling or vehicular modifications.


Disclosure: A. Falls, None; P. Ricketts, None; J. Elliott, None; K. Jordan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Falls A, Ricketts P, Elliott J, Jordan K. Counseling on Safe Driving Strategies in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/counseling-on-safe-driving-strategies-in-patients-with-osteoarthritis-and-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/counseling-on-safe-driving-strategies-in-patients-with-osteoarthritis-and-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology