ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0472

Contraception Choices in Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis and Lupus-like Disease Differ Based on Diagnosis and Teratogen Use

Caroline Siegel1, Medha Barbhaiya2, Lucy Masto1, Amaya Smole1, Bessie Stamm1, Jonah Levine1, Sarah Lieber2, Lisa Mandl2, Michael Lockshin2 and Lisa Sammaritano2, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Cohort Study, Surveys, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0460–0479) Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Individuals with systemic rheumatic disease (SRD) underutilize effective contraception even when prescribed teratogenic medications. As disease-related factors may impact contraception choice, we evaluated the association between contraception use and both SRD diagnosis and teratogenic medication use in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) or lupus-like diseases.

Methods: Women aged 18-65 years seen by a rheumatologist at our academic center ≥2 times from 2020-2022 were enrolled in a Reproductive Health and Wellness Cohort. This analysis included participants with self-reported IA or lupus-like disease. We excluded participants >50 years of age and those who self-reported menopause/premature ovarian failure, hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy, and/or infertility. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate demographics, medications, and contraception use, stratified by disease and teratogenic medication use.

Results: Of 812 cohort participants, 658 (81.0%) responded to contraception questions; 249 with reproductive capacity (mean age 36.3 ± 7.5 years, 99.2% self-reporting woman as gender identity) who self-reported IA (n=147) or lupus-like disease (n=102) were included in this analysis. Patients with IA vs. lupus-like disease were more frequently White (82.5% vs. 69.7%, p=0.04) and less frequently Hispanic/Latinx (7.5% vs. 15.7%, p=0.04). 94.8% had private insurance and 61.5% were married/partnered, with no differences between groups.

Compared to individuals with IA, those with lupus-like diseases less frequently used the birth control pill, patch, or vaginal ring (14.7% vs. 31.5%, p=0.003) and more frequently used barrier methods, fertility awareness or withdrawal (30.5% vs. 17.5%, p=0.02); groups did not differ in terms of permanent contraception, intrauterine device, or subdermal implant use [Table 1].

Compared to participants not taking teratogenic medication (n=197), those who were (n=52) more frequently reported that their rheumatologist had ever discussed contraception (44.2% vs. 21.8%, p=0.001) and more frequently reported permanent contraception use (8.0% vs. 1.1%, p=0.02). Of those taking teratogenic medication, 44.0% reported use of barrier methods, fertility awareness/withdrawal, or no contraception; frequency of any reversible method or no contraception use did not differ based on teratogen use [Table 2].

Conclusion: Among individuals with IA or lupus-like diseases and reproductive capacity seen in an academic rheumatology center, less than half used moderately/highly effective contraception. Although patients taking vs. not taking teratogenic medication were more likely to have discussed contraception with their rheumatologist, they were no more likely to use effective contraception; nearly half used less effective or no contraception. Compared to patients with IA, those with lupus-like diseases less commonly used estrogen-containing methods and more commonly used less effective contraception. Our findings can inform interventions to optimize contraception utilization in patients with SRD by targeting patients prescribed teratogenic medications and those with lupus-like diseases without contraindications to estrogen-based methods.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: C. Siegel: UCB, 12, fellowship training is supported by UCB Women's Health Fellowship Program; M. Barbhaiya: None; L. Masto: None; A. Smole: None; B. Stamm: None; J. Levine: None; S. Lieber: None; L. Mandl: Annals of Internal Medicine, 12, Associate Editor, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, 5, Up-to-Date, 9; M. Lockshin: None; L. Sammaritano: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Siegel C, Barbhaiya M, Masto L, Smole A, Stamm B, Levine J, Lieber S, Mandl L, Lockshin M, Sammaritano L. Contraception Choices in Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis and Lupus-like Disease Differ Based on Diagnosis and Teratogen Use [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contraception-choices-in-individuals-with-inflammatory-arthritis-and-lupus-like-disease-differ-based-on-diagnosis-and-teratogen-use/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contraception-choices-in-individuals-with-inflammatory-arthritis-and-lupus-like-disease-differ-based-on-diagnosis-and-teratogen-use/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology