ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2102

Construct Validity of the Six-Minute Walk Test in Knee Osteoarthritis

Sivakami Mylvaganam1, Ian stanaitis2, Gillian Hawker3 and Lauren King3, 1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2Research and Innovation Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, physical function

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2079–2105) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) significantly affects physical function, making function a core outcome in OA research. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International recommends the six-minute walk test (6MWT) as a performance-based measure of physical function in knee OA. Originally developed for cardiopulmonary conditions, the 6MWT is now used in OA populations, though its validity in this context remains unclear. Limited and conflicting evidence regarding its correlation with other function measures in OA raises questions about its utility and interpretation. This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the 6MWT in individuals with symptomatic knee OA and identify patient factors influencing six-minute walk distance (6MWD).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study within the BEST-Knee cohort, participants with knee OA completed standardized questionnaires and the 6MWT one month before total knee arthroplasty. Construct validity was assessed per COSMIN guidelines. Convergent validity was tested through hypothesized moderate-to-strong Spearman correlations (r > 0.4) between 6MWD and patient-reported physical function (KOOS-PS), pain (WOMAC pain subscale), and perceived walking ability (in blocks). Discriminant validity was tested examining correlation between 6MWD and the Lubben Social Network Scale, a measure unrelated to physical function. Known-groups validity compared 6MWD in participants who used gait aids versus not. A multivariable linear regression model assessed the association between demographic (age, sex), OA-related (WOMAC pain, KOOS-PS), biomedical (symptomatic joints, comorbidities, obesity, back pain), and psychosocial (PHQ-8, coping, social network, education) factors with 6MWD.

Results: Among 278 participants (mean age 67 years, 65% female; Table 1), greater perceived walking difficulty, higher WOMAC pain, worse KOOS-PS, and gait aid use were associated with lower 6MWD (Figure 1). Correlations were moderate with perceived walking ability (ρ = -0.451, p < 0.001) and fair with WOMAC pain (ρ = -0.323, p < 0.001) and KOOS-PS (ρ = -0.328, p < 0.001). No correlation was seen with the Lubben scale (ρ = 0.067, p = 0.281) as hypothesized. In multivariable analysis, WOMAC pain, KOOS-PS, age, sex, obesity, comorbidities, education level, and arthritis coping were associated with 6MWD (Table 2).

Conclusion: While 6MWD declines with increasing OA symptom severity, its correlations with patient-reported function are only fair-to-moderate so we cannot confirm construct validity. Performance on the 6MWT is influenced by multiple biomedical and psychosocial factors which should be accounted for in knee OA research.

Supporting image 1WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, KOOS Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, PHQ-8 Patient health questionnaire – 8.

Supporting image 2Bars represent mean six-minute walk distance (6MWD) for each category. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Mean (standard deviation) and sample size (N) indicated for each bar.

Supporting image 3Positive beta-estimates indicate greater walking distance associated with higher values or presence of the respective independent variable; negative estimates indicate reduced distance. Confidence intervals that do not include zero suggest statistically significant associations. KOOS-PS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical Function Shortform; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; PHQ8 = Patient Health Questionnaire–8. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2


Disclosures: S. Mylvaganam: None; I. stanaitis: None; G. Hawker: None; L. King: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mylvaganam S, stanaitis I, Hawker G, King L. Construct Validity of the Six-Minute Walk Test in Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/construct-validity-of-the-six-minute-walk-test-in-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/construct-validity-of-the-six-minute-walk-test-in-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology