ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2222

Construct Validity of Provisional Remission Criteria for Gout: A Dual Energy CT Study

Nicola Dalbeth1, Christopher Frampton2, Maple Fung3, Scott Baumgartner3, Savvas Nicolaou4 and Hyon K. Choi5, 1University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3Formerly Ardea Biosciences, San Diego, CA, 4Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, Imaging, outcome measures and remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Provisional domains and definitions for gout remission criteria have been proposed using consensus methodology (de Lautour et al, Arthritis Care Res 2016). These criteria include 5 domains: serum urate, tophus, flares, pain due to gout, and patient global assessment (Table). Dual energy CT (DECT) is an advanced imaging technique that allows color coding and volumetric measurement of urate crystal deposition. The aim of this study was to test the construct validity of the provisional remission criteria by examining the association of each domain and the full remission criteria with DECT urate crystal deposition.

Methods: Patients with gout on allopurinol ≥300 mg daily for at least 3 months were prospectively recruited into a multicenter DECT study, using monitored enrollment to include approximately 25% of patients with subcutaneous tophi and 50% with serum urate <6.0mg/dL. Participants all fulfilled the 1977 ARA gout classification criteria, and attended a standardized study visit, which recorded gout flare frequency in the preceding 12 months, physical examination for tophus, serum urate, and patient questionnaires. DECT of both hands/wrists, feet/ankles/Achilles, and knees were performed using the second-generation Siemens 128-slice Definition Dual Source scanner, and urate crystal volume was measured by 2 DECT radiologists. The relationship between the DECT urate crystal volume and deposition with each domain as well as with the full remission criteria set (all 5 domains achieved) was analyzed.

Results: With the exception of the pain domain, participants fulfilling each remission domain had lower DECT urate crystal volume than those who did not fulfil the domain (Table). All 5 remission domains were achieved in 23/152 (15.1%) participants. Of those fulfilling the provisional remission criteria, 10/23 (43.5%) had DECT urate crystal deposition, compared with 95/129 (73.6%) of those not fulfilling the remission criteria (P<0.001). The median (range) DECT urate crystal volume was 0.00 (0.00-0.46) cm3 for those fulfilling the remission criteria, compared with 0.08 (0.00-19.53) cm3 for those not fulfilling the criteria (P=0.002). In multivariate linear regression (of ranked DECT crystal volume data) and logistic regression models including all 5 remission domains, the serum urate and tophus domains were independently associated with the DECT urate crystal volume and deposition.

Conclusion: In people with gout taking allopurinol, a state of remission defined by the provisional remission criteria is associated with lower DECT urate crystal deposition. Furthermore, those domains most directly related to monosodium urate crystal pathophysiology (serum urate and tophus) are independently associated with urate crystal deposition measured by DECT. Overall, these findings support the construct validity of the provisional gout remission criteria.

 

Table. DECT crystal volume (cm3) according to each remission domain and provisional remission criteria. Data are presented as median (range). Results of Mann-Whitney U test analysis are shown.

Domain (definition)

Fulfilled

Not fulfilled

P

Serum urate (<0.36mmol/L)

0.03 (0.00-4.63)

n=77

0.09 (0.00-19.53)

n=75

0.016

Tophus (absence)

0.05 (0.00-1.23)

n=104

0.21 (0.00-19.53)

n=48

0.001

Flares (none in the last 12 months)

0.05 (0.00-2.57)

n=70

0.11 (0.00-19.53)

n=82

0.011

Pain due to gout (<2)

0.07 (0.00-5.11)

n=104

0.08 (0.00-19.53)

n=48

0.43

Patient global assessment of gout activity (<2)

0.05 (0.00-3.34)

n=84

0.11 (0.00-19.53)

n=68

0.002

Remission criteria (all 5 domains achieved)

0.00 (0.00-0.46)

n=23

0.08 (0.00-19.53)

n=129

0.002

 


Disclosure: N. Dalbeth, Horizon, 5,Kowa, 5,Amgen Inc., 2,AstraZeneca/Ironwood, 2,AbbVie Inc., 8,Pfizer, Inc., 8,Janssen, 8; C. Frampton, None; M. Fung, Ardea Biosciences, 3; S. Baumgartner, Ardea Biosciences, 3; S. Nicolaou, Siemens, 9; H. K. Choi, Takeda, Selecta, Kowa, and Horizon, 5,Selecta and Horizon, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dalbeth N, Frampton C, Fung M, Baumgartner S, Nicolaou S, Choi HK. Construct Validity of Provisional Remission Criteria for Gout: A Dual Energy CT Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/construct-validity-of-provisional-remission-criteria-for-gout-a-dual-energy-ct-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/construct-validity-of-provisional-remission-criteria-for-gout-a-dual-energy-ct-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology