ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0671

Concomitant Immunomodulation and Pegloticase Therapy: Experiences with a Variety of Immunomodulatory Agents in Two Community Rheumatology Practices

Aaron Broadwell1, John Albert2, Brian LaMoreaux3 and Lissa Padnick-Silver3, 1Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, Shreveport, LA, 2Rheumatic Disease Center, Milwaukee, WI, 3Horizon Therapeutics plc, Deerfield, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), gout, hyperuricemia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I (0660–0682)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with uncontrolled or refractory gout have heavy disease burden,1 but few treatment options. Pegloticase is effective for lowering serum urate (SU) in these patients, though efficacy is limited by anti-drug antibody development in some patients.2 Administering pegloticase in conjunction with an immunomodulating therapy meaningfully increased the number of patients with sustained urate lowering while on treatment.3 However, case data in the literature remain limited. The current study reports experience from two busy rheumatology practices where immunomodulating therapy is routinely prescribed in patients undergoing pegloticase treatment.

Methods: Patients who underwent concomitant pegloticase/immunomodulation therapy (initiated 2017 or later) were included. Patient and treatment characteristics were examined, along with the proportion of patients who were considered pegloticase responders (≥12 pegloticase infusions and SU < 6 mg/dL at infusion 12). Patients who remained on therapy, but had not yet reached infusion 12 were not included in responder rate analyses. All patients received pre-infusion prophylaxis (125 mg IV methylprednisolone or 100 mg hydrocortisone, 180 mg oral fexofenadine or 25 mg IVP diphenhydramine). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was also examined before therapy and at last infusion. Data are presented as mean±SD or %.

Results: 34 patients (79% male, 62.4±16.3 years) with uncontrolled gout (SU = 9.1±2.0 mg/dL, 91% had tophi, 14.7±13.4 year gout history) were included. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD, 47%). Baseline eGFR was 65.4±25.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 41% had eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. A mean of 14.6±7.1 pegloticase infusions were administered over 28.5±14.9 weeks. Immunomodulator co-therapy was initiated prior to (5.3±3.0 weeks, n=32) or at (n=2) first pegloticase infusion and included subcutaneous (subQ) methotrexate (MTX; 15.4±4.9mg/week [range: 10-25 mg/week], n=20), oral MTX (15.3±3.6 mg/week [range: 7.5-20 mg/week], n=9), oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; all 1000 mg/day, n=3), and oral azathioprine (AZA; all 100 mg/day, n=2). Overall treatment responder rate was 89.3% (n=28). Response rates were 93% for subQ MTX (n=14), 89% for oral MTX (n=9), 100% for MMF (n=3), and 50% for AZA (n=2). eGFR remained essentially unchanged during therapy (+10.3±16.9 ml/min/1.73 m2) and CKD stage remained stable or improved in 85% of patients (Stage 1 to 2 [n=1], Stage 2 to 3a [n=1], Stage 3a to 3b [n=2],). 34 gout flares occurred in 19 patients (56%), no infusion reactions or infections were noted, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusion: These data provide further support for concomitant immunomodulator/pegloticase therapy, showing similar efficacy rates to both an open-label trial with oral MTX (79%)4 and a systematic literature review of all immunomodulators (83%).3

References:

1. Becker MA, et al. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1041-8.
2. Sundy JS, et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-20.
3. Keenan RT, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021;51:347-52.
4. Botson J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:442.


Disclosures: A. Broadwell, Horizon, 6; J. Albert, Horizon, 6; B. LaMoreaux, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 3, 11; L. Padnick-Silver, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 3, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Broadwell A, Albert J, LaMoreaux B, Padnick-Silver L. Concomitant Immunomodulation and Pegloticase Therapy: Experiences with a Variety of Immunomodulatory Agents in Two Community Rheumatology Practices [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/concomitant-immunomodulation-and-pegloticase-therapy-experiences-with-a-variety-of-immunomodulatory-agents-in-two-community-rheumatology-practices/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/concomitant-immunomodulation-and-pegloticase-therapy-experiences-with-a-variety-of-immunomodulatory-agents-in-two-community-rheumatology-practices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology