ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1245

Comparison of Secukinumab Vs Adalimumab in a Cost per Responder Analysis Based on a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy Data for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis at 48 Weeks from the US Perspective

Jeffrey D. Greenberg1, Efthalia Nikoglou2, Praveen Gunda3, Jacqueline Palmer4 and Steffen Jugl5, 1Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, 2Novartis Ireland, Ltd, Dublin, Ireland, 3Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India, 4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 5Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Adalimumab, comparative effectiveness and harms and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Comparison of Secukinumab vs Adalimumab in a cost per responder analysis based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy data for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis at 48 weeks from the US perspective Jeff Greenberg 1, Efthalia Nikoglou2, Praveen Gunda3, Jacqueline Palmer4, Steffen Jugl5 1 New York University school of medicine, New York NY USA

2 Novartis Ireland Ltd, Dublin, Ireland

3 Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India

4 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA

5 Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Background/Purpose: The objective of this analysis was to estimate and compare the long-term cost per responder based on the American College of Rheumatology outcomes (ACR 20/50/70) following 48 weeks of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment with the anti-IL-17A antibody Secukinumab relative to the anti-TNF antibody Adalimumab.

Methods: The cost per responder for each treatment, namely Secukinumab and Adalimumab was estimated by dividing the drug acquisition cost for the course of treatment with its response rate. Drug costs were estimated on the basis of the official US drug acquisition costs and the number of doses required for 48 weeks. The long-term response rates were estimated using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) technique based on the data from FUTURE 2 and ADEPT clinical trials of Secukinumab and Adalimumab respectively. MAIC analysis matched the age, weight, race and gender distribution, PASI score, HAQ-DI score, PsA duration (years), swollen joint count, CRP , proportions of patients using methotrexate, with psoriasis ≥3% body surface area, presence of dactylitis, presence of enthesitis and TNF-naive at the baseline. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted by varying the choice of baseline characteristics (includes all variables except PsA duration (years), swollen joint count, and CRP) used in MAIC analysis.

Results: The effective sample sizes after matching the baseline characteristics were 15, 25 for Secukinumab 150 mg, Secukinumab 300 mg respectively, while the sample size for Adalimumab was 151. MAIC analysis showed ACR (20/50/70) response rates were significantly higher for Secukinumab 150mg and 300mg compared to Adalimumab at 48 weeks. ACR 20 response rates were 79%, 82% and 56% ACR 50 response rates were 68%, 73% and 44%, whereas the ACR 70 response rates were 39%, 50% and 30% for Secukinumab 150mg, Secukinumab 300 mg and Adalimumab respectively (Figure 1A). Sensitivity analysis also showed higher response rates for Secukinumab 150mg and 300mg compared to Adalimumab. Among PsA patients, cost per ACR20 responder were $72,906, $70,993 and $80,412 cost per ACR50 responder were $85,480, $79,760 and $103,561, whereas costs per ACR70 responder were $150,276, $115,934 and $151,890 for Secukinumab 150mg, Secukinumab 300mg and Adalimumab respectively (Figure 1B). Sensitivity analysis also produced similar results.

Conclusion: ACR (20/50/70) response rates were significantly higher for Secukinumab 150mg and 300mg compared to Adalimumab at 48 weeks. The long term cost per responder for all ACR outcomes at 48 weeks were consistently lower for secukinumab (150,300mg) vs. adalimumab. These findings indicate that Secukinumab represents a cost-efficient treatment choice for PsA patients in the US.

Figure 1: Predicted response rate (A) and cost per responder (B) analysis of ACR (20/50/70) for Secukinumab vs Adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis at 48 weeks in principal analysis


Disclosure: J. D. Greenberg, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5; E. Nikoglou, Novartis Ireland Ltd, 3; P. Gunda, Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., 3; J. Palmer, None; S. Jugl, Shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG, 1,Full-time employee of Novartis Pharma GA, Basel, Switzerland, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Greenberg JD, Nikoglou E, Gunda P, Palmer J, Jugl S. Comparison of Secukinumab Vs Adalimumab in a Cost per Responder Analysis Based on a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy Data for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis at 48 Weeks from the US Perspective [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-secukinumab-vs-adalimumab-in-a-cost-per-responder-analysis-based-on-a-matching-adjusted-indirect-comparison-of-efficacy-data-for-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-at-48-weeks-from-the/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-secukinumab-vs-adalimumab-in-a-cost-per-responder-analysis-based-on-a-matching-adjusted-indirect-comparison-of-efficacy-data-for-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-at-48-weeks-from-the/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology