Abstracts tagged "comparative effectiveness and harms and psoriatic arthritis"

Abstract Number: 1245 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Comparison of Secukinumab Vs Adalimumab in a Cost per Responder Analysis Based on a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy Data for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis at 48 Weeks from the US Perspective
Jeffrey D. Greenberg¹, Efthalia Nikoglou², Praveen Gunda³, Jacqueline Palmer⁴ and Steffen Jugl⁵, ¹Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, ²Novartis Ireland, Ltd, Dublin, Ireland, ³Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India, ⁴Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, ⁵Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Comparison of Secukinumab vs Adalimumab in a cost per responder analysis based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy data for the treatment of psoriatic…
Abstract Number: 2868 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Relative Efficacy of Adalimumab Versus Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
Keith A. Betts¹, Manish Mittal², Avani Joshi², Jinlin Song¹ and Yanjun Bao², ¹Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, ²AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
Background/Purpose: The phase 3 FUTURE 1 and FUTURE 2 trials demonstrated efficacy of secukinumab (SEC) for active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, there is limited data…
Abstract Number: 1555 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
An Indirect Comparison and Cost per Responder Analysis of Adalimumab, Methotrexate (MTX) and Apremilast in the Treatment of MTX-naïve Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Patients
Vibeke Strand¹, Jenny Griffith², Keith Betts³, Alan Friedman², James Signorovitch³ and Arijit Ganguli^2,4, ¹Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, ²AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, ³Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, ⁴AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
Background/Purpose: Apremilast (APR), a small molecule inhibitor of phospodiesterase 4 (PDE-4), was recently approved for treating PsA patients in the US. To date, there are…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].