ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0507

Comparison of Secukinumab versus Adalimumab Efficacy by Sex in Psoriatic Arthritis from a Phase 3b, Double-blinded, Randomized, Active-controlled Study

Grace Wright1, Peter Nash2, Laura Coates3, Jordi Gratacós4, Frank Behrens5, Kevin Ding6, Weibin Bao7, Luminita Pricop6, Corine Gaillez8 and Iain McInnes9, 1Association of Women in Rheumatology, New York, NY, 2School of Medicine Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 3University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 4University Hospital Parc Tauli Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 5CIRI/Rheumatology & Fraunhofer IME, Research Division Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 6Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, 7Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hannover, 8Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 9Institute of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gender, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment I: Psoriatic Arthritis (0504–0508)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:50PM

Background/Purpose: Lower efficacy to anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment has been reported in female patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as compared to males in clinical registries.1 The EXCEED study (NCT02745080) evaluated efficacy and safety of secukinumab (SEC) versus adalimumab (ADA) as first-line monotherapy in biologic-naïve patients with PsA. Here, we report the impact of sex on efficacy outcomes with SEC versus ADA at Week 52 from the EXCEED study.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive SEC 300 mg subcutaneous at baseline, Week 1-4, followed by dosing every 4 weeks until Week 48 or ADA 40 mg subcutaneous at baseline followed by same dosing every 2 weeks until Week 50. The detailed study design and objectives have been previously described.2 The primary analysis was to demonstrate superiority of SEC versus ADA on ACR20 response at Week 52 using logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline weight as a covariate. A post-hoc analysis for ACR20 response was performed using the same model with treatment, sex and smoking status as factors to adjust for imbalances observed in the baseline characteristics. Comparative post–hoc analysis was performed with SEC versus ADA by sex for other efficacy outcomes through Week 52.

Results: A total of 853 patients were randomized to receive SEC (N=426) or ADA (N=427) with similar baseline demographics except for higher proportion of females (51% in SEC; 46% in ADA) and smokers (21·8% in SEC; 17·8% in ADA) in the SEC group.2 The primary endpoint for ACR20 response at Week 52 was not met. ACR20 response at Week 52 was, SEC (67·4%) versus ADA (61·4%); p=0·0227, after adjusting for sex and smoking status. The female patients had higher tender joint count, patient global assessment, HAQ-DI, PsA pain and enthesitis compared to males (Table 1). A greater proportion of patients with SEC (83·0% females; 91·3% males) completed Week 52 versus ADA (74·2% females; 83·4% males). SEC was associated with numerically higher efficacy on joints in females at Week 52 without any notable differences in the ACR core components versus ADA. Overall, higher efficacy was demonstrated in males versus females at Week 52 (Table 2).

Conclusion: Females had greater baseline disease severity than males. Secukinumab was associated with higher retention rate in both males and females at Week 52. Secukinumab provided numerically higher clinical responses in females versus adalimumab in musculoskeletal and skin endpoints and physical function at Week 52. In males, similar efficacy on musculoskeletal endpoints for both treatments and greater efficacy on skin with secukinumab were observed. These interesting findings warrant further investigation for reproducibility or uniqueness.

References

1. Højgaard P, et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57(9):1651-60.
2. McInnes IB, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1496–505.

Table 1: Baseline clinical characteristics

Table 2: Efficacy outcomes by sex at Week 52


Disclosure: G. Wright, Exagen, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Myriad Autoimmune, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 5, 8, Sanofi Genzyme, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; P. Nash, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; L. Coates, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Amgen Inc., 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, Medac, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, MSD, 5; J. Gratacós, AbbVie Inc., 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc., 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutical, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8; F. Behrens, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Bionorica, 2, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Genzyme, 5, 8, Boehringer, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8; K. Ding, Novartis, 3; W. Bao, Novartis, 1, 3; L. Pricop, Novartis, 1, 3; C. Gaillez, Novartis and BMS, 1, Novartis, 3; I. McInnes, Novartis, 9, AbbVie, 9, Celgene, 9, Janssen, 2, 9, UCB, 2, 9, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 9, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Lilly, 9, LEO, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wright G, Nash P, Coates L, Gratacós J, Behrens F, Ding K, Bao W, Pricop L, Gaillez C, McInnes I. Comparison of Secukinumab versus Adalimumab Efficacy by Sex in Psoriatic Arthritis from a Phase 3b, Double-blinded, Randomized, Active-controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-secukinumab-versus-adalimumab-efficacy-by-sex-in-psoriatic-arthritis-from-a-phase-3b-double-blinded-randomized-active-controlled-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-secukinumab-versus-adalimumab-efficacy-by-sex-in-psoriatic-arthritis-from-a-phase-3b-double-blinded-randomized-active-controlled-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology