ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2815

Comparison of Lupus Nephritis Induction Therapy with Cyclophosphamide High Dose Versus Low Dose

Juliana Valim1, Verônica Lima2, Fernanda Guimarães3, Fernanda Chaer4 and Branca Souza5, 1Rheumatology, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology, Irmandade Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Rheumatology, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 4Rheumatology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 5Reumatologia, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: cyclophosphamide, Lupus nephritis, remission and treatment options, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III: Biomarkers and Nephritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To Compare the induction therapy of lupus nephritis with cyclophosphamide (CYC) high dose or low dose and identify possible predictors of disease remission.

Methods:  Retrospective study of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to ACR criteria, diagnosed with lupus nephritis (LN), histological class III or IV, who underwent induction therapy with CYC high or low dose, respectively: CYC 0,5 to 1 g/m² body surface area monthly for six months or CYC 0,5 g every 15 days for three months. We compared the frequency of renal remission between these two groups, high dose CYC or low dose CYC, right after the induction period and after the 12 and 24 months following. Complete renal remission was defined as proteinuria less than 500 mg/24 hours. Partial remission was defined as a 50% reduction of the proteinuria starting with levels <3g. We collected clinical and laboratorial data before the induction therapy to identify possible predictors of remission.

Results:  There were 55 patients, 35 underwent high dose therapy of CYC and 20 underwent low dose therapy of CYC. There were no significant statistical differences in baseline clinical and laboratory features between these two groups. The frequency of complete renal remission right after the induction therapy was 74 % in CYC high dose group compared to 45 % in the CYC low dose group (p = 0.03). 25% of patients in the low dose group, who did not achieved remission after the 3 months of therapy, started new treatment with CYC high dose. At the end of follow-up (24 months), the frequency of remission in CYC high dose group was 86% and did not differ from the CYC low dose group (80%, p=0,21). The initial proteinuria and the serum values of complement, creatinine and albumin before the start of induction therapy, as well as the use of anti-proteinuric and antimalarial drugs have not been predictors of renal remission (p> 0.05). Table-Comparison of remission frequency between the CYC high dose group and low dose group at the end of induction therapy (after 6 and 3 months respectively)

  CYC HIGH DOSE GROUP CYC LOW DOSE GROUP   
Achieved Remission n(%) 26 (74%) 9 (45%)   p=0,03
Did not achieved remission n(%) 9 (26%) 11 (55%)

Conclusion: The group of patients undergoing CYC high dose induction therapy achieved higher frequency of remission than the group with low dose of CYC after the induction therapy period. We did not found any predictor of renal remission.


Disclosure: J. Valim, None; V. Lima, None; F. Guimarães, None; F. Chaer, None; B. Souza, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Valim J, Lima V, Guimarães F, Chaer F, Souza B. Comparison of Lupus Nephritis Induction Therapy with Cyclophosphamide High Dose Versus Low Dose [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-lupus-nephritis-induction-therapy-with-cyclophosphamide-high-dose-versus-low-dose/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-lupus-nephritis-induction-therapy-with-cyclophosphamide-high-dose-versus-low-dose/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology