ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2026
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Abstract Number: 1285

Comparision of Urate Burden in Well and Poorly Controlled Gout Patients: A Dual-Energy CT Study

Min Kyung Chung1, Hyeran Hyun2, Ji Young Hwang2 and Jisoo Lee1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 2Department of Radiology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Gout and uric acid, Imaging

Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allows sensitive and quantative detection of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in patients with gout. Although its usefulness in diagnosing gout is well defined, its role in monitoring changes of MSU depositions after urate lowering therpy (ULT) is unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the difference in MSU deposition amount and pattern detected by DECT in well and poorly controlled gout patients.

Methods: DECT scans of feet and ankles were performed in 109 gout patients. Sixteen joints of ankles and feet, and achilles tendon insertion sites were evaluated for the presence of MSU deposition. The total volume of MSU deposition was quantified using an automated software program of DECT. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic features were obtained at the time of DECT evaluation. Patients who maintained serum uric acid (sUA) level < 6.0mg/dL for more than 6 months prior to DECT evaluation were considered ‘well-controlled’ and otherwise, ‘poorly-controlled’.

Results: Twenty-five (22.9%) well-controlled patients were compared with 84 (77.1%) poorly-controlled. Well-controlled group showed mean sUA of 4.97±0.84mg/dL while poorly-controlled group showed mean sUA of 8.01±1.78mg/dL. Well-controlled group had significantly lower mean volume of MSU deposition compared with the poorly-controlled group (0.12cm3 vs 0.78cm3, p=0.001), and had lower number of MSU deposition (2 vs 4, p=0.002). Although volume and number of MSU depositions were significantly decreased, MSU depositions were still detected in the well-controlled group. In well-controlled group, MSU depositions were less frequently detected in MTP and ankle joints compared with the poorly-controlled group, whearas frequency of MSU deposition was not significantly different in the Chopart joint and Achilles tendon sites.

Conclusion: Well-controlled gout patients showed significantly reduced urate burden. However, since MSU deposition does not completely resolve even in well-controlled pateints, continuous ULT is recommended for optimal management of the gout patients.


Disclosure: M. K. Chung, None; H. Hyun, None; J. Y. Hwang, None; J. Lee, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chung MK, Hyun H, Hwang JY, Lee J. Comparision of Urate Burden in Well and Poorly Controlled Gout Patients: A Dual-Energy CT Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparision-of-urate-burden-in-well-and-poorly-controlled-gout-patients-a-dual-energy-ct-study/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparision-of-urate-burden-in-well-and-poorly-controlled-gout-patients-a-dual-energy-ct-study/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology