ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1669

Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Methotrexate, TNF and IL6 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Checkpoint Inhibitor Arthritis

Anne Bass1, Noha Abdel-Wahab2, Pankti Reid3, Jeffrey Sparks4, Cassandra Calabrese5, Deanna Jannat-Khah, DrPH, MSPH6, Diviya Rajesh6, Nilasha Ghosh6, Komal Mushtaq7, Farah Al Haj8, Adewunmi Falohun9, Lydia Gedmintas10, Lindsey MacFarlane11, Senada Arabelovic11, Adi Diab2, Ami Shah12, Clifton O. Bingham III13, Karmela Kim Chan6 and Laura C. Cappelli14, 1Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 2UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, 6Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 7Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 8Sinai Grace Hospital/ Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 9MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 10Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 11Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 12Johns Hopkins Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD, 13Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 14Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, autoimmune diseases, comparative effectiveness, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 10:30AM-11:30AM

Background/Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor associated arthritis (ICI-A) affects ∼4% of ICI-treated cancer patients and often persists. Given its long duration, it is important to identify effective treatments that do not interfere with cancer responses. However, there are no studies comparing the safety or effectiveness of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for this condition.

Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter observational study. Inclusion criteria were 1. ICI-A or ICI-associated PMR with ≥ 1 inflamed peripheral joint and 2. Treatment with a TNF or IL6R inhibitor (TNFi or IL6Ri), and/or methotrexate (MTX). Patients with a preexisting autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from time of ICI initiation. The secondary outcome was time to arthritis control, defined as grade 1 arthritis (mild pain, not interfering with function) and prednisone ≤ 10 mg after DMARD initiation. Descriptive statistics and comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test, T-Tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ANOVA as appropriate. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify factors associated with cancer progression and arthritis control. Variables included in the models were DMARD (exposure of interest), ICI and cancer type, age, sex, and time from ICI to DMARD initiation.

Results: One hundred twenty-two patients were included, mean (SD) age 62 (12) years, 39% female, 39% with melanoma, 8% non-small cell lung cancer, 19% renal cell carcinoma and 7% bladder cancer (Table 1). Seventy percent received PD(L)1 monotherapy. Median (IQR) time from ICI initiation to ICI-A onset was 170 (63,369) days, and from ICI-A onset to initiation of a DMARD 385 (258,668) days. Time from ICI initiation to DMARD start was shortest for IL6Ri-only treated patients. Median CDAI at rheumatology presentation was 22 (11,26) and 41% of the patients had other concomitant immune related adverse events. ICI were held for ICI-A in 21% of patients and discontinued in 41%. The DMARD used was a TNFi in 13%, IL6Ri 35%, MTX 31%, TNFi/MTX 9% and IL6Ri/MTX 11%. Total duration of DMARD treatment was shortest for TNFi-only treated patients. A Kaplan-Meier curve showing time to cancer progression by DMARD treatment is shown in Figure 1, and time to arthritis control in Figure 2. Compared to patients treated with a TNFi ± MTX, patients treated with IL6Ri ± MTX had a similar time to cancer progression (HR 0.74; 95%CI 0.32-1.72, P=0.49) and to arthritis control (HR 0.84; 95%CI 0.46-1.50, P=0.55). Patients treated with MTX alone had a trend toward a longer time to cancer progression (HR 0.39; 95%CI 0.13-0.1.19, P=0.10) and a longer time to arthritis control (HR 0.37; 95%CI 0.19-0.72, P=0.004) than patients treated with a TNFi ± MTX.

Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study suggests that ICI-A patients treated with either a TNFi ± MTX or an IL6Ri ± MTX have a shorter time to cancer progression but faster arthritis control than patients treated with MTX alone. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to verify these findings and to identify the optimal approach to managing patients with high grade ICI-A.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Description of the study cohort

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curve showing time to cancer progression by DMARD treatment

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve showing time to arthritis control by DMARD treatment


Disclosures: A. Bass, None; N. Abdel-Wahab, None; P. Reid, provisional patent; J. Sparks, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Inova Diagnostics, Janssen, Optum, Pfizer; C. Calabrese, Sanofi, Astrazenica; D. Jannat-Khah, DrPH, MSPH, Cytodyn, AstraZeneca, Walgreens; D. Rajesh, None; N. Ghosh, GoodRx, Musculo; K. Mushtaq, None; F. Al Haj, None; A. Falohun, None; L. Gedmintas, None; L. MacFarlane, None; S. Arabelovic, None; A. Diab, None; A. Shah, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Medpace/Eicos, Kadmon Corporation; C. Bingham III, AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly; K. Chan, None; L. C. Cappelli, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS).

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bass A, Abdel-Wahab N, Reid P, Sparks J, Calabrese C, Jannat-Khah, DrPH, MSPH D, Rajesh D, Ghosh N, Mushtaq K, Al Haj F, Falohun A, Gedmintas L, MacFarlane L, Arabelovic S, Diab A, Shah A, Bingham III C, Chan K, C. Cappelli L. Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Methotrexate, TNF and IL6 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Checkpoint Inhibitor Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-the-safety-and-effectiveness-of-methotrexate-tnf-and-il6-inhibitors-for-the-treatment-of-checkpoint-inhibitor-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-the-safety-and-effectiveness-of-methotrexate-tnf-and-il6-inhibitors-for-the-treatment-of-checkpoint-inhibitor-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology