ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2698

Comparative Efficacy of Tacrolimus-Based Induction Therapy with and without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Yun Kyu Kim1, Hajeong Lee2, Jun Won Park3, Eun Bong Lee3, You-Jung Ha4 and Jin Kyun Park2, 1Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, 4Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cohort Study, comparative effectiveness, Lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment II (2693–2698)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 12:45PM-1:00PM

Background/Purpose: The efficacy of calcineurin inhibitors in the induction treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) has been increasingly supported by recent studies. Based on these findings, current guidelines recommend a combination of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and glucocorticoids (GC) as an option for the first-line induction therapy. However, several studies have also demonstrated that TAC + GC therapy is effective for induction therapy, with favorable safety profile. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the efficacy of TAC + GC versus TAC + MMF + GC for remission induction in patients with proliferative LN.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study, designed as a target trial emulation, included patients with biopsy proven proliferative LN who received either TAC + GC or TAC + MMF + GC as induction therapy between September 2007 and July 2023. Based on the induction regimen, patients were classified into the TAC + GC and TAC + MMF + GC groups. The primary outcome was 12-month total renal response, defined as achieving either complete or partial renal response after 12 months. To address the baseline imbalances between the two groups, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied. The comparative efficacy of TAC + MMF + GC compared to TAC + GC was estimated by using binary logistic regression, based on both as-started (corresponding to intention-to-treat) and on-treatment (corresponding to per-protocol) analyses.

Results: A total of 115 patients (48 in TAC + GC group and 67 in TAC + MMF + GC group) were included in the analysis. The baseline characteristics of the study population is shown in Table 1. The 12-month total renal response was achieved in 16 (33.3%) patients in the TAC + GC group and 40 (59.7%) patients in the TAC + MMF + GC group. Both groups showed improvements in serum albumin and proteinuria, while renal function declined (Figure 1). Compared to the TAC + GC group, the TAC + MMF + GC group showed significantly higher 12-month total renal response in both as-started and on-treatment analyses (Table 2). Adverse drug reactions occurred in 7 (14.6%) patients in the TAC + GC group and 11 (16.4%) patients in the TAC + MMF + GC group.

Conclusion: Compared to TAC + GC, TAC + MMF + GC therapy showed significantly higher renal response and comparable adverse drug reactions in patients with proliferative LN. These findings support TAC + MMF + GC as the preferred TAC-based induction regimen for proliferative LN.

Supporting image 1Table 1

Supporting image 2Figure 1

Supporting image 3Table 2


Disclosures: Y. Kim: None; H. Lee: None; J. Park: Samsung Bioepis, 5; E. Lee: None; Y. Ha: None; J. Park: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kim Y, Lee H, Park J, Lee E, Ha Y, Park J. Comparative Efficacy of Tacrolimus-Based Induction Therapy with and without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis: A Target Trial Emulation Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-of-tacrolimus-based-induction-therapy-with-and-without-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-lupus-nephritis-a-target-trial-emulation-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-of-tacrolimus-based-induction-therapy-with-and-without-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-lupus-nephritis-a-target-trial-emulation-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology