ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1781

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Cyclophosphamide As Induction Therapy for Lupus Nephritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Young Ho Lee and Gwan Gyu Song, Rheumatology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: cyclophosphamide, Lupus nephritis, meta-analysis, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cyclophosphamide (CYC) regimens improved renal outcomes, and have long been considered the gold standard for inducing renal remission and preventing renal flares in proliferative glomerulonephritis (WHO class III and IV). However, their benefits are outweighed by the significant drug-related adverse effects, such as an increased risk of serious infections and ovarian toxicity. Thus, other immunosuppressive drugs have been used for induction treatment of lupus nephritis, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and tacrolimus. However, evidence from a small number randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the relative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus or MMF with CYC, as induction agents in lupus nephritis, has been inconclusive, mainly because of their small sample sizes. This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, MMF, and CYC as induction therapy for lupus nephritis.

Methods: RCTs examining the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, MMF, and CYC for induction therapy in patients with lupus nephritis were included. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs.

Results: Nine RCTs including 972 patients met the inclusion criteria. There pairwise comparisons were performed, including 11 direct comparisons. Tacrolimus showed a significantly higher overall response rate (complete remission plus partial remission) than CYC (OR 2.35, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.03–5.45), and was more efficacious than MMF (OR 1.60, 95% CrI 0.70–3.57). MMF was superior to CYC in terms of overall response (OR 1.45, 95% CrI 0.96–2.42). Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tacrolimus had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the overall response (SUCRA = 0.9321), followed by MMF (SUCRA = 0.5385), and CYC (SUCRA = 0.0294). In terms of safety, tacrolimus showed the highest probability of decreasing the risk of serious infections (SUCRA = 0.9253), followed by MMF (SUCRA = 0.4027), and CYC (SUCRA = 0.1720).

Conclusion: Tacrolimus was the most efficacious induction treatment for patients with lupus nephritis, and had the highest probability of decreasing the risk of serious infections. Higher remission rates combined with a more favorable safety profile suggest that MMF is superior to CYC as induction treatment in these patients.


Disclosure: Y. H. Lee, None; G. G. Song, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee YH, Song GG. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Cyclophosphamide As Induction Therapy for Lupus Nephritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-and-safety-of-tacrolimus-mycophenolate-mofetil-and-cyclophosphamide-as-induction-therapy-for-lupus-nephritis-a-bayesian-network-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-and-safety-of-tacrolimus-mycophenolate-mofetil-and-cyclophosphamide-as-induction-therapy-for-lupus-nephritis-a-bayesian-network-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology