ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2378

Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Laboratory and Therapeutic Strategies Among Blacks with Rhupus, SLE and RA

Naureen Kabani1, Joshy Pathiparampil 2, Madina Abduraimova 2, Latoya Freeman-Beman 2, Sima Terebelo 1, Abida Hasan 1, Christon Grant 1, James Salgado 1, Manjeet Bhamra 1, Tracian James-Goulbourne 1, Khabbab Amin 1, Yamen Homsi 3 and Isabel McFarlane 2, 1SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, 2SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 3NYU Langone Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and African-Americans

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: Safety and Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rhupus is the overlap of SLE and RA. While a few studies have been conducted among Rhupus patients, no studies have focused on Black population with Rhupus. Our aim was to describe the clinical, laboratory, radiographic and therapeutic profiles of predominantly Black patients with Rhupus and to compare this group with age and sex-matched patients with SLE and with RA.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of SLE and RA overlap patients followed at 2 large urban hospitals. Rhupus patients were identified by ICD codes and compared to age and sex matched cohort of SLE only and RA only groups. Descriptive statistics using SPSS® version 24 were applied to analyze the differences between the three cohorts.

Results: 38 patients met the ACR criteria for both RA and SLE (Rhupus) with 94.7% being women, mean age of 50.9±14.4 (SEM). Blacks represented 81.6% with a BMI of 28.6±7.3Kg/m2.  50% had hypertension, 71.1% had at least one cardiovascular (CV) risk factor and 26.3% had 3 or more CV risk factors. Mean ESR = 58.28 ± 5.45 and CRP = 28.94 ± 8.8. There were no significant differences in CV risk factors, CV outcomes and inflammatory markers between the three cohorts. The rate of leukopenia and CRP levels were significantly higher in the Rhupus compared to the SLE and RA groups.

Compared to RA only group there were higher rates of smoking and ANA positivity among Rhupus populations. Leukopenia and positive RF and ACPA rates were frequent among Rhupus patients compared to RA only cohort. Corticosteroids, MTX, and biologic DMARDs use did not differ between Rhupus and RA cohorts. Rate of utilization of other-than-MTX DMARDs and the combination of steroid with DMARDs was higher among the Rhupus compared to the RA only cohort.

When comparing Rhupus and SLE patients, the rates of mucocutaneous lesions, serositis, neurologic manifestations, and laboratory values including autoantibodies were no different between the groups. Smoking, arthritis, hand XR abnormalities, erosions, seropositive RA were more frequent among the Rhupus vs. SLE patients.  However, lupus nephritis and RNP antibodies were less frequent in Rhupus compared to SLE only group.  Corticosteroids, MTX, conventional and biologic DMARDs and combination therapy were more frequently used in Rhupus compared to SLE population.

Conclusion: In our predominantly Black population, Rhupus patients had higher rates of smoking and ANA positivity compared to RA patients. It also had lower rate of positivity for RF or ACPA.  Rates of smoking, arthritis, erosions, positivity for RF, ACPA and aCL antibodies were higher among Rhupus compared to SLE patients.  These results suggest smoking to be a potential risk factor for Rhupus and might play a role in the underlying pathophysiology of this overlap syndrome. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and elucidate risk factors and predictors of Rhupus to help develop preventive and therapeutic strategies for this important disease entity.


Table 1

Comparison of the Demographic, Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Rhupus, RA, and SLE patients


Table 2

Comparison of Clinical, Laboratory, Radiographic, and Therapeutic Profiles in patients with Rhupus and RA only patients


Table 3

Comparison of Clinical, Laboratory, Radiographic, and Therapeutic Profiles of Rhupus and SLE only patients


Disclosure: N. Kabani, None; J. Pathiparampil, None; M. Abduraimova, None; L. Freeman-Beman, None; S. Terebelo, None; A. Hasan, None; C. Grant, None; J. Salgado, None; M. Bhamra, None; T. James-Goulbourne, None; K. Amin, None; Y. Homsi, None; I. McFarlane, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kabani N, Pathiparampil J, Abduraimova M, Freeman-Beman L, Terebelo S, Hasan A, Grant C, Salgado J, Bhamra M, James-Goulbourne T, Amin K, Homsi Y, McFarlane I. Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Laboratory and Therapeutic Strategies Among Blacks with Rhupus, SLE and RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-analysis-of-clinical-laboratory-and-therapeutic-strategies-among-blacks-with-rhupus-sle-and-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-analysis-of-clinical-laboratory-and-therapeutic-strategies-among-blacks-with-rhupus-sle-and-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology