ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0282

Clinical Meaningfulness and Improvement Thresholds of Myositis Core Set Measures: Association with Patient-Reported Outcomes

Shiri Keret1, Raisa Lomanto Silva2, Irada Choudhuri3, Eugenia Gkiaouraki3, Tanya Chandra3, Nantakarn Pongtarakulpanit3, Shreya Sriram3, Niladri Bhowmick3, Vaidehi Kothari3, Kaushik Sreerama Reddy3, Eaman Alhassan4, Anushka Aggarwal5, Maha Almackenzie6, Siamak Moghadam-Kia4, Dana Ascherman7, Chester V. Oddis7 and Rohit Aggarwal8, 1Bnai Zion Medical Center, Atlit, Israel, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, 4University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India, 6Medical Cities of the Ministry of the Interior, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 7University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 8University of Pittsburgh, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Pittsburgh, United States of America, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Myopathies, Outcome measures, Patient reported outcomes, physical activity, quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0280–0305) Muscle Biology, Myositis & Myopathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The six myositis core set measures (CSMs) are widely utilized to assess disease activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, their association with how the patient feels and functions, and minimal thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, remain undefined. We aimed to evaluate the validity, meaningfulness, and minimal clinical thresholds of change in CSMs in relation to symptoms, function, and quality of life in patients with IIM.

Methods: Adults with IIM were enrolled in a 6-month prospective observational study. Monthly data collected included CSMs (patient global assessments, Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] and creatine kinase [CK]) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as pain and fatigue (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF). Physician measures, including MMT-8 (scale 0-80), MDAAT, and physician global assessments, were gathered every three months. Baseline and longitudinal associations were evaluated using Spearman correlation and linear mixed models. Responsiveness, effect sizes, and clinically important differences (CID) were assessed using patient- and physician-reported change at 6 months as anchors.

Results: Fifty patients (mean age 51.6 ± 14.9, 60% females) were enrolled, including 48% dermatomyositis, 12% polymyositis, 18% necrotizing myopathy, and 22% anti-synthetase syndrome. Most CSMs demonstrated strong baseline and longitudinal associations with key patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures, including pain, fatigue, physical function, and quality of life. CK showed weaker associations at baseline, but significant longitudinal correlations with most outcome measures (Table 1). In patients with improvement in absolute percentage change in the CSMs and TIS over 6 months, corresponding positive trends were observed in quality of life (PCS, MCS), fatigue (VAS), pain (VAS), and physical function (PROMIS-PF) (Figure 1). Specifically, greater improvements in patient and physician global assessments, disability (HAQ-DI), and muscle strength (MMT) were associated with incremental gains in quality of life and physical function measures, along with reductions in fatigue and pain. In patients who improved based on the patient global impression of change (PtGIC) and physician global impression of change (PhGIC) anchors, significant improvements were observed in physician global disease activity, MMT, HAQ-DI, CK, and extra-muscular disease activity, with moderate to large effect sizes. The CIDs according to PtGIC were 2.1 for physician global disease activity, 1.4 for extra-muscular disease activity, 1.7 for patient global disease activity, 4.2 for MMT, 0.5 for HAQ, and 1475 IU/L for CK levels. Similar results were observed for physician-reported improvement (Table 2).

Conclusion: Myositis CSMs showed strong validity and responsiveness, reflecting meaningful changes in patient symptoms, function, and quality of life, and supporting their utility in IIM clinical trials and practice. CIDs were defined for all CSMs, improving their interpretability and application in clinical trials and routine care.

Supporting image 1Table 1.

Longitudinal correlations between core set measures (CSMs) and outcome measures using linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and race. Most CSMs showed strong associations with patient-reported outcomes and other clinical metrics, supporting their validity in tracking disease activity in IIM.

Supporting image 2Figure 1.

Changes in patient-reported outcomes (PCS, MCS, and Fatigue VAS) stratified by levels of improvement in CSMs and TIS over 6 months. Greater improvements in core measures were associated with meaningful gains in quality of life and symptom burden, as perceived by patients.

Supporting image 3Table 2.

Six-month changes, effect sizes, and clinically important differences (CIDs) of CSMs in groups defined by patient- and physician-reported improvement. These values establish thresholds for meaningful clinical change and highlight the responsiveness of individual CSMs and TIS.


Disclosures: S. Keret: None; R. Lomanto Silva: None; I. Choudhuri: None; E. Gkiaouraki: None; T. Chandra: None; N. Pongtarakulpanit: None; S. Sriram: None; N. Bhowmick: None; V. Kothari: None; K. Sreerama Reddy: None; E. Alhassan: None; A. Aggarwal: None; M. Almackenzie: None; S. Moghadam-Kia: None; D. Ascherman: None; C. V. Oddis: None; R. Aggarwal: Alexion, 2, ANI Pharmaceuticals, 2, Argenx, 2, Artasome, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, CabalettaBio, 2, Capella, 2, Capstanx, 2, CSL Behring, 2, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, I-Cell, 2, Immunovant, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kezar, 2, Kyverna, 2, Lilly, 2, Manta Medicines, 2, Nkarta, 2, Novartis, 2, Octapharma, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Priovant, 2, 5, Teva, 2, Tourmaline Bio, 2, UCB, 2, Verismo Therapeutics, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Keret S, Lomanto Silva R, Choudhuri I, Gkiaouraki E, Chandra T, Pongtarakulpanit N, Sriram S, Bhowmick N, Kothari V, Sreerama Reddy K, Alhassan E, Aggarwal A, Almackenzie M, Moghadam-Kia S, Ascherman D, V. Oddis C, Aggarwal R. Clinical Meaningfulness and Improvement Thresholds of Myositis Core Set Measures: Association with Patient-Reported Outcomes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-meaningfulness-and-improvement-thresholds-of-myositis-core-set-measures-association-with-patient-reported-outcomes/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-meaningfulness-and-improvement-thresholds-of-myositis-core-set-measures-association-with-patient-reported-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology