ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2050

Clinical Enthesitis Concerns Half the Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Is More Frequent in Trials Than in Observational Studies and Is Assessed Heterogeneously: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of 84,262 Patients from 212 Studies

caroline pignon1, Laure Gossec2, Bruno Fautrel3, Clementina López Medina4 and Noemie bibas5, 1Faculté de médecine Créteil, PARIS, France, 2Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, 3INSERM, UMRS 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, and Sorbonne University – Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 4Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain, 5Sorbonne Université, paris

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease Activity, Epidemiology, Joint Structure, meta-analysis, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic & Inflammatory Diseases Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Enthesitis is considered a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), however data on the frequency and consequences of enthesitis are conflicting.

 

To analyze clinical enthesitis in PsA including its prevalence, scores used and localization through a systematic literature review with meta-analysis.

Methods: Systematic review in PubMed from January 2010 to June 2023, of studies of adult patients with confirmed PsA, reporting information on enthesitis (frequency, characteristics and/or consequences). Studies could be trials or observational studies, published in English.

Data collected at baseline, included (a) the prevalence of clinical enthesitis (i.e., frequency of having at least one active enthesitis), (b) scores used to assess enthesitis, (c) number of entheses involved per patient with enthesitis, (d) localization of enthesitis, assessed as localizations cited as a top 3 localization, and (e) impact of enthesitis on patient-reported outcomes and use of analgesics.

Univariate random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled percentages and means in the overall population, by score used, and study type.

Results: Overall, 84,262 PsA patients from 212 studies (48 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 164 observational studies) were analyzed. The weighted mean age and disease duration were 50.2 (SD 3.1) years and 7.7 (8.4) years, respectively; 52.6 % were women.

The pooled prevalence of enthesitis was 48.1% [95% confidence interval, 43.1-53.1]; heterogeneity was high (I2 100%). The prevalence was higher in RCTs (pooled prevalence 70.1% [65.6-74.6]) than in observational studies (30.4% [25.5-35.3]) and appeared similar in recent studies (Figure). Enthesitis was assessed through the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) in 63.7% studies, the MASES (33.1%) and/or the SPARCC (29.3%). In 16 studies comparing the scores, the prevalence and the pooled number of entheses involved per patient varied according to the score used, between 59.6% [43.4 – 75.8] and 1.61 [1.42-1.81] for the LEI, and 62.3% [48.2 – 76.3] and 5.67 [5.28-6.06] for the SPARCC respectively. Most common sites for enthesitis were the Achilles tendon (part of the top 3 localizations in 64.5% studies), lateral epicondyle of the elbow (41.9%) and plantar fascia (25.8%). In 14 studies, the impact of enthesitis was studied: patients with vs without enthesitis had higher pain, fatigue, and analgesic use.

Conclusion: Enthesitis is a frequent manifestation in PsA, with a pooled prevalence of 48.1%; enthesitis was more prevalent in trials than in observational studies, reflecting recruitment patterns. The clinical assessment of enthesitis remains challenging, with heterogeneity in the scores used influencing the results: the most used score was the LEI which also led to the lowest prevalence of enthesitis and lowest number of entheses involved. The Achilles tendon was confirmed as the most frequent localization of enthesitis. Links with patients’ quality of life should be further explored. 

Supporting image 1

Prevalence of enthesitis in patients with PsA: forest plot presented by year of publication, for 44 studies with more than 500 patients.


Disclosures: c. pignon: None; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sandoz, 2, UCB, 2, 5; B. Fautrel: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, Celgene, 2, Celltrion, 2, Chugai, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, Lilly, 2, 5, Medac, 2, MSD, 2, 5, Mylan, 2, Nordic Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, Sobi, 2, UCB, 2; C. López Medina: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6; N. bibas: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

pignon c, Gossec L, Fautrel B, López Medina C, bibas N. Clinical Enthesitis Concerns Half the Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Is More Frequent in Trials Than in Observational Studies and Is Assessed Heterogeneously: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of 84,262 Patients from 212 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-enthesitis-concerns-half-the-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-is-more-frequent-in-trials-than-in-observational-studies-and-is-assessed-heterogeneously-a-systematic-review-with-meta-analysi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-enthesitis-concerns-half-the-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-is-more-frequent-in-trials-than-in-observational-studies-and-is-assessed-heterogeneously-a-systematic-review-with-meta-analysi/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology