ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1040

Clinic Personnel Perceptions Were Favorable for the Implementation of a Patient Decision-Aid for a Diverse Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Population: A Study in 15 U.S. Rheumatology Clinics

Jasvinder Singh1, Larry Hearld2, Walter Chatham3, Sonali Narain4, Narender Annapureddy5, Diane Kamen6, Kimberly Trotter7, vikas Majithia8, Cathy Lee Ching9, Zineb Aouhab10, Swamy Venuturupalli11, Daniel Wallace12, rosalind Ramsey-Goldman13, Alfred Kim14, Maureen McMahon15, S. Sam Lim16, Kalpana Bhairavarasu17, Alexa Meara18 and Kenneth Kalunian19, 1Baylor College of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 3University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 4Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 5Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 6Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 7University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 8University of Missisippi Medical Center (UMC), Jackson, MS, 9UMMC, Jackson, MS, 10Loyola University Medical Center, Oak Brook, IL, 11Attune Health, Beverly Hills, CA, 12Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Studio City, CA, 13Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 14Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 15UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 16Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 17Baylor College of Medicine, Sugar Land, TX, 18The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, COLUMBUS, OH, 19University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disparities, Health Services Research, Lupus nephritis, Patient reported outcomes, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: To understand clinic personnel feedback regarding the implementation of a self-administered patient decision-aid (PtDA) for lupus in regular, outpatient rheumatology clinics.

Methods: We provided self-administered lupus PtDA through a touchscreen tablet in clinics, a weblink or as smartphone application, in 15 rheumatology clinics across the U.S. Clinic personnel outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12- and 24-month follow-up based on validated surveys included: (1) Organizational Readiness to Implement Change (ORIC; score range 1-5); (2) Team Learning and Psychological Safety Survey (TLPSS; score range 1-7); and (3) perceived lupus PtDA appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, success, permanence, and sustenance (all scale score range of 1-5). Higher scores are consistent with best/most desirable outcomes.

Results: Clinic personnel’s (n=182-184) baseline ORIC commitment and efficacy scores (range 1-5) ranged from 3.5 to 4.2, and 3.4 to 4.4 for sites, respectively; TLPSS scores (range 1-7) were 3.9 to 5.5 for internal learning, 3.7 to 5.6 for external learning, and 4.3 to 6.2 for psychological safety.

Clinic personnel perceived lupus PtDA outcomes optimally at baseline with all scale score range of 1-5, higher values indicating better outcome: (1) appropriateness, 3.43 (SD, 0.86); (2) acceptability, 3.53 (SD, 0.83); (3) feasibility, 3.44 (SD, 0.71); (4) success, 3.41 (SD, 0.73); (5) permanence, 3.22 (SD, 0.74).

Conclusion: We found that clinic personnel rated various aspects of the lupus PtDA well during its implementation in rheumatology outpatient clinics. It remains to be seen as to whether barriers to sustaining this lupus PtDA, which is freely available in the public domain now, can be overcome in busy clinic sessions. We also need to understand if different barriers and facilitators operate in private versus academic rheumatology clinics.

Funding:
Research reported in this work was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (SDM-2017C2-8224). The statements in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PCORI, its Board of Governors, or the Methodology Committee.


Disclosures: J. Singh: Adaptimmune Therapeutics, 2, Adept Field Solutions, 2, Aebona Pharmaceuticals, 11, Amarin, Viking and Moderna pharmaceuticals, 11, Atai life sciences, Kintara therapeutics, Intelligent Biosolutions, Acumen pharmaceutical, TPT Global Tech, Vaxart pharmaceuticals, Atyu biopharma, Ad, 11, Charlotte's Web Holdings, 11, Clinical Care options, 2, Enzolytics Inc, 11, Fidia, 2, Focus forward, 2, GeoVax Labs, 11, Intuitive Surgical Inc./Philips Electronics North America, 12, food and beverage payments, Jupiter Life Science, 2, MedIQ, 2, Medscape, 2, Medusas, 2, Navigant consulting, 2, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, 11, PK Med, 2, Practice Point communications, 2, Putnam associates, 2, ROMTech, Atheneum, Clearview healthcare partners, American College of Rheumatology, Yale, Hulio, Horizon Pharmaceuticals/DINORA, Frictionless Solution, 2, Schipher, 2, Seres Therapeutics, 11, speaker’s bureau of Simply Speaking, 6, Tonix Parmaceuticals, 11, Trio Health, 2, Two Labs Inc, 2, UBM LLC, 2, WebMD, 2, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, 5; L. Hearld: None; W. Chatham: None; S. Narain: None; N. Annapureddy: None; D. Kamen: Alpine Immune Sciences, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), 1; K. Trotter: None; v. Majithia: None; C. Lee Ching: None; Z. Aouhab: None; S. Venuturupalli: None; D. Wallace: None; r. Ramsey-Goldman: None; A. Kim: Amgen, 2, ANI Pharmaceuticals, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, Atara Bio, 2, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, 2, Cargo Therpeutics, 2, Exagen Diagnostics, 2, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Kypha, 2, 4, 10, Miltenyi Biotech, 2, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, Synthekine, 2, Techtonic Therapeutics, 2, The Rheumatology Education Group, 6; M. McMahon: Amgen, 2, Artivia, 2, Astra Zeneca, 6, Aurinia, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Genentech, 2, GSK, 2, 6; S. Lim: Accordant, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 5, Gilead, 5, GSK, 2, Novartis, 5, UCB, 5; K. Bhairavarasu: None; A. Meara: None; K. Kalunian: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh J, Hearld L, Chatham W, Narain S, Annapureddy N, Kamen D, Trotter K, Majithia v, Lee Ching C, Aouhab Z, Venuturupalli S, Wallace D, Ramsey-Goldman r, Kim A, McMahon M, Lim S, Bhairavarasu K, Meara A, Kalunian K. Clinic Personnel Perceptions Were Favorable for the Implementation of a Patient Decision-Aid for a Diverse Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Population: A Study in 15 U.S. Rheumatology Clinics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinic-personnel-perceptions-were-favorable-for-the-implementation-of-a-patient-decision-aid-for-a-diverse-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-population-a-study-in-15-u-s-rheumatology-clinics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinic-personnel-perceptions-were-favorable-for-the-implementation-of-a-patient-decision-aid-for-a-diverse-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-population-a-study-in-15-u-s-rheumatology-clinics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology