ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2850

Changes in Urinary Biomarker Levels Can Predict Treatment Responses in Lupus Nephritis

Joan Wither1, Stephenie Prokopec2, Babak Noamani1, Dennisse Bonilla1, Zahi Touma3, Carmen Avila-Casado4, Heather Reich5, James Scholey5, Paul R. Fortin6, Paul Boutros2 and Carolina Landolt-Marticorena1, 1Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: biomarkers and nephritis, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III: Biomarkers and Nephritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  The relapsing and remitting nature of lupus nephritis (LN) poses a challenge to clinicians who must balance the risk of long term kidney damage with the side effects of treatment. Management of this condition would be greatly aided by the identification of biomarkers that accurately reflect and predict treatment responses. We previously identified and validated a panel of urinary biomarkers that are specifically elevated in SLE patients with active LN as compared to active patients without LN or LN patients in remission. In this study we sought to determine whether changes in the levels of these urinary biomarkers predict treatment responses.

Methods:  21 SLE patients with biopsy-proven LN were followed longitudinally for a minimum of 2 years after treatment. Levels of 15 urinary biomarkers including Clusterin, Cystatin C, NGAL, PF4, vWF,sVCAM-1, GM-CSF, GRO, IL-15, IL-6, MCP-1, Adiponectin, PAI-1, MMP-7, and TIMP-1, were measured by Luminex. Patients were classified as having a complete response (n = 12), partial response (n=4), or treatment (Tx) failure (n=5) at 2 years following Tx, based upon previously established criteria. Urinary biomarker levels were considered abnormal if they were > 2 SD above the mean for 24 healthy controls. Data were analyzed using non-parametric statistics.

Results:  At 3-6 months following treatment, the changes in biomarker levels from the first visit were not significantly different between complete responders and partial responders or Tx failures. However, at 1 year (11-17 months) following treatment, 5 urinary biomarkers, sVCAM-1, Adiponectin, IL-15, vWF, and MCP-1, demonstrated significantly different changes from baseline in complete responders as compared to Tx failures, with the majority of responders demonstrating improvement and the majority of Tx failures demonstrating worsening. Since urinary biomarker levels that were not corrected for urinary osmolality correlated best with clinical outcomes, subsequent analyses were done with the uncorrected values. The presence of a normal urinary Adiponectin by 11-17 months was the best predictor of a complete response, with 11 of 12 patients who normalized being complete responders and 1 a partial responder. Similar but slightly less discriminative results were obtained for the other 4 urinary biomarkers. Conversely, the presence of an abnormal urinary vWF at 11-17 months was the strongest predictor of an adverse outcome with 4 of 7 patients with abnormal levels being Tx failures. Notably, all patients that were Tx failures that had normal levels of urinary biomarkers at 11-17 months subsequently developed abnormal levels, whereas patients who were complete responders eventually normalized the majority of these five biomarkers. Partial responders demonstrated normalization with delayed kinetics. Comparison of changes in urinary biomarkers with changes in proteinuria in Tx Failures over time indicated that elevations in urinary biomarkers preceded elevations in proteinuria in some patients.

Conclusion:  Measurement of urinary biomarkers can provide valuable insight into treatment responses in lupus nephritis.


Disclosure: J. Wither, None; S. Prokopec, None; B. Noamani, None; D. Bonilla, None; Z. Touma, None; C. Avila-Casado, None; H. Reich, None; J. Scholey, None; P. R. Fortin, None; P. Boutros, None; C. Landolt-Marticorena, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wither J, Prokopec S, Noamani B, Bonilla D, Touma Z, Avila-Casado C, Reich H, Scholey J, Fortin PR, Boutros P, Landolt-Marticorena C. Changes in Urinary Biomarker Levels Can Predict Treatment Responses in Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-urinary-biomarker-levels-can-predict-treatment-responses-in-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-urinary-biomarker-levels-can-predict-treatment-responses-in-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology