ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1382

Changes in Imaging Markers in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD) Treated with Nintedanib: Sub-Study of the SENSCIS Trial

Stephen Humphries1, Eric Hachulla2, Mark Hamblin3, Takashi Ogura4, Dag Wormanns5, Carina Ittrich6, Frank Risse6, Margarida Alves7, Martina Gahlemann8 and David Lynch9, 1National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA, Denver, CO, 2Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Université de Lille, Lille, France, Lille, France, 3University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USA, Kansas City, KS, 4Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Centre, Yokohama, Japan, Yokohama, Japan, 5Evangelische Lungenklinik, Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Germany, 6Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany, Biberach an der Riss, Germany, 7Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 8Boehringer Ingelheim (Schweiz) GmbH, Basel, Switzerland, Basel, Switzerland, 9National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA, Denver

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Imaging, interstitial lung disease, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the SENSCIS trial in patients with SSc-ILD, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks by 44% compared with placebo. The effects of nintedanib on markers of lung damage on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were assessed in a sub-study.

Methods: Patients enrolled in the SENSCIS trial had SSc with onset of first non-Raynaud symptom ≤7 years before screening and an extent of fibrotic ILD ≥10% on HRCT (based on assessment of the whole lung). Patients were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. In a sub-study, HRCT images were assessed at baseline and at week 52 or 60. The extent of regions with evidence of abnormalities (honeycombing and/or reticulation and/or ground-glass opacity) was assessed in both lungs and changes from baseline were categorized by two radiologists as “much better”, “better”, “same”, “worse”, “much worse” or “unknown”. Disagreement between the radiologists in the categories “much better” or “better” and “worse” or “much worse” were considered “intermediate better” or “intermediate worse”. An ordinal logistic regression analysis (proportional odds model) adjusted for anti-topoisomerase antibody I status was used to compare changes between the treatment groups. Changes from baseline in a quantitative fibrosis score, a measure of the extent (%) of reticular patterns with architectural distortion, were assessed using data-driven texture analysis. Analyses were conducted in patients who received trial medication up to at least week 24 and had an evaluable HRCT scan at week 52/60.

Results: Of 576 patients who participated in the SENSCIS trial, 150 participated in the HRCT sub-study (nintedanib 73, placebo 77). The rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was similar in the overall trial population and in patients who participated in the HRCT sub-study (Figure). Compared with the placebo group (n=59), a lower proportion of patients in the nintedanib group (n=52) had a worsening in qualitative parameters (i.e., “worse”, “intermediate worse”, or “much worse”) from baseline to week 52–60 (40.4% vs 45.8%) (Table). Ordinal logistic regression analysis demonstrated a numerically greater risk of worsening in qualitative parameters in the placebo group compared with the nintedanib group (OR 1.24 [95% CI: 0.63, 2.47]; p=0.53). Adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in quantitative fibrosis score were 2.50 (0.88) % in the nintedanib group (n=23) and 2.80 (0.73) % in the placebo group (n=31) (difference: −0.31% [95% CI: −2.36, 1.75]; p=0.77).

Conclusion: In a sub-study of the SENSCIS trial, qualitative and quantitative changes on HRCT over 52–60 weeks were small. Numerical but non-significant trends towards less worsening were observed in patients treated with nintedanib versus placebo. These analyses were limited by the small number of patients who had an evaluable HRCT scan at the follow-up visit.


Disclosure: S. Humphries, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Veracyte, 2, Imidex LLC, 5; E. Hachulla, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, 5, Roche, 5, Chugai, 5; M. Hamblin, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 8, Genentech, 2, 8, Biogen, 2, FibroGen, 2, Galapagos, 2, Galecto, 2, Promedior, 2, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 2; T. Ogura, Boehringer Ingelheim, 6, 8, Eisai Co., Ltd, 8, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, 8; D. Wormanns, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Roche, 5, 8, GE Healthcare, 8; C. Ittrich, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; F. Risse, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; M. Alves, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; M. Gahlemann, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1; D. Lynch, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Parexel, 5, Veracyte, 5, Daiichi Sankyo, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Humphries S, Hachulla E, Hamblin M, Ogura T, Wormanns D, Ittrich C, Risse F, Alves M, Gahlemann M, Lynch D. Changes in Imaging Markers in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD) Treated with Nintedanib: Sub-Study of the SENSCIS Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-imaging-markers-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-ssc-ild-treated-with-nintedanib-sub-study-of-the-senscis-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-imaging-markers-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-ssc-ild-treated-with-nintedanib-sub-study-of-the-senscis-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology