ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2662

Changes in Blood Pressure and Proteinuria at One Year in Two Lupus Nephritis Clinical Trials

L. Michelle Gomez Mendez1, Marco Prunotto2, Jian Dai3, Paul Brakeman1, Maria Dall'Era1, Jay Garg3 and Matthew Cascino3, 1UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 2Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, 3Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: hypertension, Lupus nephritis, ocrelizumab, patient outcomes and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Hypertension predicts poor long-term renal outcomes for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) [1, 2]. We sought to characterize relationships between blood pressure and proteinuria using data from randomized clinical trials.

Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from LUNAR (NCT00282347) [3] and BELONG (NCT00626197) [4], which compared rituximab [3] or ocrelizumab [4] vs. placebo in addition to background therapy for the treatment of LN. Complete renal response (CRR) was defined for LUNAR as urine protein/creatinine (UPCR) levels below 0.5, creatinine levels ≤115% of baseline, and inactive urinary sediment. CRR for BELONG was defined as UPCR <0.5 and creatinine ≤125% of baseline. Data from baseline and 1 year visits were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between change in BP and CRR while adjusting for baseline proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Linear regression was used to estimate the association between change in BP and change in proteinuria while adjusting for race, treatment received, and baseline eGFR.

Results: Each 10 mmHg increase in baseline systolic BP had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.8 for CRR at 1 year (95% CI 0.74, 0.97). This association did not remain significant after adjusting for baseline proteinuria and eGFR (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.79, 1.05). Baseline systolic and diastolic BP had a weak correlation with baseline UPCR (r=0.2, p<0.01 for both). Change in systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to 1 year was associated with improvement in proteinuria at 1 year in adjusted regression: each 10 mmHg decrease in systolic BP was associated with a 0.45 g/g (CI 0.3, 0.6, p<0.01) improvement in proteinuria at 1 year; each 10 mmHg decrease in diastolic BP was associated with a 0.44 g/g (CI 0.2, 0.65, p<0.01) improvement in proteinuria. These results were consistent when studies were analyzed separately.

Conclusion: Baseline systolic BP was associated with the probability of CRR at 1 year in univariate analysis. However, this association was explained by baseline proteinuria and eGFR. Changes in systolic or diastolic BP were significantly associated with decreases in proteinuria at 1 year. Further characterization of the relative contributions of BP, disease severity, and immunosuppression are warranted.

1.    Yang et al., Lupus 2015; 24(14):1468.

2.    Contreras et al., Lupus 2005; 14(11):890.

3.    Rovin et al., Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(4):1215.

4.    Mysler et al., Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65(9):2368.


Disclosure: L. M. Gomez Mendez, None; M. Prunotto, Hoffmann-La Roche, 1, 3; J. Dai, Genentech, Inc., 1, 3; P. Brakeman, None; M. Dall'Era, Genentech, Inc., 5; J. Garg, Genentech, Inc., 1, 3; M. Cascino, Genentech, Inc., 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gomez Mendez LM, Prunotto M, Dai J, Brakeman P, Dall'Era M, Garg J, Cascino M. Changes in Blood Pressure and Proteinuria at One Year in Two Lupus Nephritis Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-blood-pressure-and-proteinuria-at-one-year-in-two-lupus-nephritis-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-blood-pressure-and-proteinuria-at-one-year-in-two-lupus-nephritis-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology