ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1189

Certain Dosages of Fasinumab Provides Superior Benefits over Placebo in Mitigating Osteoarthritis Symptoms Albeit at Increased Health Detriments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Muhammad Sohaib Khan1, Wania Moeen2, Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala2, Muhammad Usman2, Umar Mahmood2, Syed Ashad Ahmed Fatmi2, Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar2, Hania Shahzad3, Muhammad Talal Ibrahim4, Nisar Ahmed5, Badaruddin Sahito2 and Muhammad Sohaib Asghar6, 1Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 2Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 3UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, 4The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 5Rapido’s Clinica Familiar, Chicago, 6AdventHealth, Sebring, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: meta-analysis, Osteoarthritis, Pharmacoepidemiology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Fasinumab, a newly developed anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, is currently under investigation for its potential to alleviate symptoms in osteoarthritis patients. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of Fasinumab compared to placebo in osteoarthritis patients.

Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched for double-blinded Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) comparing Fasinumab with placebo till February 2024. Primary outcomes were WOMAC pain, WOMAC function, and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) scores. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 was used for quality assessment. Statistical analysis was carried out using a Random Effects model. Subgroups based on dosages were also made.

Results: Six RCTs involving 9,429 participants were included. At 16 weeks, 1 mg Subcutaneous (SC) Every four weeks (Q4W), 1 mg SC Every eight weeks (Q8W), and 3 mg SC Q4W showed a greater statistically significant reduction in WOMAC pain and function scores compared to placebo. However, according to minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs), only 1mg SC Q4W and 3mg SC Q4W may provide clinically meaningful reductions in WOMAC pain ([MD: -1.05, (95% C.I. -1.32 to -0.78), p< 0.00001, I²=28%] and [MD: -1.16, (95% C.I. -1.58 to -0.75), p< 0.00001, I²=0%], respectively) and function scores ([-1.05 (95% C.I. -1.32 to -0.79), p< 0.00001, I²=20%] and [MD: -1.24, (95% C.I. -1.65 to -0.83), p< 0.00001, I²=0%], respectively) more than placebo. A 1 mg SC Q4W dosage regimen is also favored over a placebo in improving PGA scores at 16 weeks. However, Fasinumab use increases the risk of adverse events, including Joint-replacement surgery and Adjudicated Arthropathy.

Conclusion: Specific Fasinumab dosages showed greater efficacy in alleviating pain and improving function and PGA scores compared to placebo. However, Fasinumab use may be associated with increased health detriments, such as increased risk of adjudicated arthropathy and all-cause joint replacement. 

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Forest plot of comparison: Fasinumab vs Placebo, outcome: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain at 16 weeks. SC, Subcutaneous; Q4W, Every Four Weeks; Q8W, Every Eight Weeks; mg, milligrams.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Forest plot of comparison: Fasinumab vs Placebo, outcome: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function at 16 weeks. SC, Subcutaneous; Q4W, Every Four Weeks; Q8W, Every Eight Weeks; mg, milligrams.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3. Forest plot of comparison: Fasinumab vs Placebo, outcome: Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 16 weeks. SC, Subcutaneous; Q4W, Every Four Weeks; Q8W, Every Eight Weeks; mg, milligrams.


Disclosures: M. Khan: None; W. Moeen: None; U. Shabbar Banatwala: None; M. Usman: None; U. Mahmood: None; S. Ahmed Fatmi: None; S. Muneeb Akhtar: None; H. Shahzad: None; M. Ibrahim: None; N. Ahmed: None; B. Sahito: None; M. Asghar: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khan M, Moeen W, Shabbar Banatwala U, Usman M, Mahmood U, Ahmed Fatmi S, Muneeb Akhtar S, Shahzad H, Ibrahim M, Ahmed N, Sahito B, Asghar M. Certain Dosages of Fasinumab Provides Superior Benefits over Placebo in Mitigating Osteoarthritis Symptoms Albeit at Increased Health Detriments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/certain-dosages-of-fasinumab-provides-superior-benefits-over-placebo-in-mitigating-osteoarthritis-symptoms-albeit-at-increased-health-detriments-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/certain-dosages-of-fasinumab-provides-superior-benefits-over-placebo-in-mitigating-osteoarthritis-symptoms-albeit-at-increased-health-detriments-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology