ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 2229

Can We Predict Inadequate Response to Allopurinol Dose Escalation? Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Lisa K. Stamp1, Peter T. Chapman2, Murray Barclay3, Anne Horne4, Christopher Frampton1, Paul Tan5, Jill Drake6 and Nicola Dalbeth5, 1University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, 4Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 5University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 6University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Allopurinol and gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Session Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The two most common causes of inadequate serum urate (SU) lowering with allopurinol are low adherence and under-dosing. Those who are adherent, but do not reach target SU despite allopurinol dose escalation, could be considered to have “inadequate response” to allopurinol. The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons for not reaching target SU and to identify factors that predict response and inadequate response in a randomised controlled trial of allopurinol dose escalation in gout.

Methods: We analysed data from participants in a 24-month open, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial. Participants undergoing allopurinol dose escalation were classified as having: complete response (CR) – reached target SU at month 9 and 12 of the dose escalation phase OR if still dose escalating at month 9 reached target SU by month 12; partial response (PR) – reached target at some stage but not fulfilling criteria for CR; or inadequate response (IR) – did not reach target SU at any time. The analysis was designed to minimise the effects of two common causes of inadequate response; low adherence and under-dosing.

Results: Inadequate response was uncommon, occurring in 13/150 (8.7%), compared to 82 (54.7%) CR, and 55 (36.6%) PR. Mean (SEM) SU was higher at the end of the 12-month dose escalation in the IR group compared with both CR and PR groups; 7.6 (0.31) vs. 5.01 (0.06) and 5.97 (0.17) mg/dl respectively (p<0.001). There was a relatively linear relationship between increasing allopurinol dose and increasing plasma oxypurinol and between increasing plasma oxypurinol and decreasing SU in the CR group (Figure A and B) over the 12-month dose escalation period. Those with partial response had more static dose and SU levels that were close to the target SU while those with inadequate response had no obvious relationship between allopurinol dose, plasma oxypurinol and SU (Figure C-E). Using ROC curve analysis, baseline SU≥8mg/dl had a sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 85.1% in predicting inadequate response. The OR for an inadequate response if baseline SU was ≥8mg/dl was 11.7 (95%CI 3.3-41.2). For those with baseline SU ≥8mg/dl and baseline allopurinol dose >200mg/d, 7/15 (47%) had an inadequate response.

Conclusion: A minority of people with gout never reach target SU when allopurinol dose is increased in a treat-to-target manner. Approximately half of those with SU≥8mg/dl despite allopurinol >200mg/d have an inadequate response to dose escalation. 

Figure: Relationship between mean allopurinol dose and mean (SEM) plasma oxypurinol and mean serum urate and mean (SEM) plasma oxypurinol in the complete response, partial response, and inadequate response groups at months 0 (●), 3 (□), 6(Δ), 9(▼) and 12 (ο) of the dose escalation period.

 


Disclosure: L. K. Stamp, Amgen Inc., 8; P. T. Chapman, None; M. Barclay, None; A. Horne, None; C. Frampton, None; P. Tan, None; J. Drake, None; N. Dalbeth, Horizon, 5,Kowa, 5,Amgen Inc., 2,AstraZeneca/Ironwood, 2,AbbVie Inc., 8,Pfizer, Inc., 8,Janssen, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay M, Horne A, Frampton C, Tan P, Drake J, Dalbeth N. Can We Predict Inadequate Response to Allopurinol Dose Escalation? Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-predict-inadequate-response-to-allopurinol-dose-escalation-analysis-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed March 27, 2023.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-predict-inadequate-response-to-allopurinol-dose-escalation-analysis-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences