ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0179

Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Diversity in Lupus Clinical Trials Through Investigator and Research Staff Engagement

Tessa Englund1, Katherine Holben1, Simone Frank2, Khadeejatul-Kubraa Lawal1, Julie Hsieh3, Christine Lee3 and Saira Sheikh1, 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 3U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Minority Health, Qualitative Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus disproportionately affects diverse racial and ethnic minority populations, yet there is a significant disparity between those affected and those enrolled in clinical trials. The Lupus Research Alliance’s Lupus Clinical Investigators Network (LuCIN), the largest lupus clinical trials network in North America, works to address this gap by facilitating advancements in lupus treatments across more than 50 academic medical center sites. The aim of the present work is to characterize the perspectives, preferences, and unmet needs of LuCIN site representatives to enhance the participation of underrepresented groups in lupus clinical trials.

Methods: Three online Community Feedback Sessions (CFSs) were held with LuCIN site investigators and research staff in January 2024. CFSs were led by a trained facilitator according to discussion guides developed to gather actionable feedback on: challenges and facilitators for recruiting and enrolling racial and ethnic minority patients into lupus clinical trials; effective communication with diverse patients about clinical trials; and strategies and solutions to promote the enrollment of underrepresented patients. The sessions were recorded, and feedback was summarized to explore key takeaways and recommendations to advance equity in lupus clinical trials.

Results: Nine LuCIN investigators and seven research staff participated in the feedback sessions, representing 14 LuCIN sites. Key barriers identified included socioeconomic factors and logistical challenges, such as transportation access, inadequate compensation, visit time, and the cost of missing work. Building long-term relationships with patients and involving trusted messengers (e.g., primary care providers, community health workers) were emphasized as critical solutions to addressing historical and current issues around mistrust in research and medicine. Both investigators and research staff stressed the importance of using culturally appropriate language in communications about clinical trials, including for patients who speak languages other than English. Session participants identified opportunities for ongoing education, patient engagement, and information sharing to improve communication about clinical trials within and between clinical professionals, patients, and communities. Investigators focused on mentorship and innovative communication methods, while research staff emphasized specific training programs and resources for better understanding lupus and addressing community concerns.

Conclusion: Addressing the underrepresentation of diverse populations in lupus clinical trials requires a multifaceted approach. While investigators and research staff shared common concerns and suggestions for advancing equity in lupus clinical trials, each group contributed unique insights and identified unmet needs based on their roles and prior experiences. Engaging and incorporating perspectives from the entire clinical trial research team can help identify comprehensive and actionable strategies to promote equity in lupus clinical trials.


Disclosures: T. Englund: None; K. Holben: None; S. Frank: None; K. Lawal: None; J. Hsieh: None; C. Lee: None; S. Sheikh: AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Cabaletta Bio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Englund T, Holben K, Frank S, Lawal K, Hsieh J, Lee C, Sheikh S. Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Diversity in Lupus Clinical Trials Through Investigator and Research Staff Engagement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bridging-the-gap-enhancing-diversity-in-lupus-clinical-trials-through-investigator-and-research-staff-engagement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bridging-the-gap-enhancing-diversity-in-lupus-clinical-trials-through-investigator-and-research-staff-engagement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology