ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0818

Biologics Initiation in Moderate vs Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Prospective Observational Study from a Canadian Registry

Nancy Guo1, Xiuying Li2, Mohammad Movahedi3, Angela Cesta4 and Claire Bombardier5, 1Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2OBRI at University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Toronto - Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, Cohort Study, Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Comparative Effectiveness, Biosimilars, Withdrawal, & the Real World (0813–0845)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Prior studies have shown that in the real-world setting, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have lower disease activity than those studied in clinical trials. However, randomized controlled trials for biologics continue to mainly recruit patients with severe disease. To assess the implications of this practice, our study investigates the proportion of patients achieving remission (DAS28-ESR ≤ 2.6), in RA patients with moderate disease activity and severe disease activity, at 12 months’ post starting their first biologic, and identifies baseline predictors of biologic response.

Methods: This study included RA patients who have never been treated with a biologic and initiated their first biologic while enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) registry, between 2008 and 2019. Patients selected had either moderate RA (DAS28 ≥ 3.2 to ≤ 5.1) or severe RA (DAS28 > 5.1). Comparisons were made between the moderate and severe disease groups using the student’s t-test for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test potential predictors of remission. Backward stepwise model selection was applied to select variables with p-value ≤0.10. Multiple imputation (MCMC method; n=20) was used to impute missing data.

Results: Overall, 641 patients initiated their first biologic, 483 had follow up data at 12 months (moderate disease activity=264; severe disease activity=219). In the moderate group, the mean age (SD) was 55.7 (13.1) and 80% were female. In the severe group, mean age (SD) was 58.4 (12.3) and 81% were female. At time of biologic initiation, the mean DAS28 for the moderate group was 4.1 (0.5), and 6.0 (0.6) for the severe group. After 12 months of starting a biologic, the proportion of patients achieving remission was 50% in the moderate group, and 23% in the severe group (p< 0.0001). In contrast, the proportion of patients achieving significant clinical change from baseline (improvement in DAS28 ≥ 1.2) was 78% in the severe group, compared to 66% in the moderate group (p=0.0049). More specifically, the absolute improvement in DAS28 after 12 months was higher in the severe group at 2.2 (1.5), compared to a change of 1.4 (1.3) in the moderate group (p< 0.0001). Negative predictors of remission include female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.97; p=0.039), and higher HAQ-DI score (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.68; p< 0.001). In turn, moderate disease at time of biologic initiation (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.50-3.79; p=0.0390) was identified as a positive predictor of remission.

Conclusion: This prospective cohort study found RA patients with moderate disease activity are more likely to reach targeted states (remission and low disease activity), whereas severe patients have greater absolute improvements in DAS28 and HAQ-DI but are less likely to achieve remission. Moderate disease is a positive predictor for remission, whereas female gender and a higher HAQ-DI score are negative predictors.

Table 1. Outcomes at 12 months among patients with RA who initiated the first biologic


Disclosures: N. Guo, None; X. Li, None; M. Movahedi, None; A. Cesta, None; C. Bombardier, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, BGP Pharma ULC, 1, 6, Gilead, 5, GSK, 1, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, 5, Medreleaf/Aurora, 5, Merck, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, 1, 5, Sandoz, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Guo N, Li X, Movahedi M, Cesta A, Bombardier C. Biologics Initiation in Moderate vs Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Prospective Observational Study from a Canadian Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologics-initiation-in-moderate-vs-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-prospective-observational-study-from-a-canadian-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologics-initiation-in-moderate-vs-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-prospective-observational-study-from-a-canadian-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology