ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2021

Beliefs, Attitudes, and Preferences of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Concomitant Cancer with Respect to RA Therapy

Juan Ruiz1, Sheneze Madramootoo2, Maria A. Lopez-Olivo1, Namrata Singh3 and Maria Suarez-Almazor4, 1The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3University of Washington, Bellevue, WA, 4MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Qualitative Research, rheumatoid arthritis, risk factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2019–2038) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with cancer could potentially result in poor cancer outcomes because of immunosuppression. Adequate data for shared decision-making in patients with RA and cancer is scarce, as there are uncertainties about the risk of various RA therapies on cancer progression and recurrences. The aim of this study was to identify the beliefs, preferences, and informational needs of patients with RA and cancer with respect to the harms, benefits, and risk uncertainties of RA therapy.

Methods: We conducted individual interviews of 20 patients with RA and cancer recruited consecutively at outpatient clinics in a cancer center. We used a semi-structured guide for the interviews. We explored the following themes: i) past experiences in medical encounters, ii) beliefs and attitudes about harms and benefits of RA, and iii) decision making process about RA treatment. We conducted a thematic analysis to interpret data.

Results: Fifteen (75%) patients were female, mean age was 59.4 years (SD 10.2). Median RA duration was 11 years. Four (20%) patients had breast cancer, four (20%) had melanoma, two (10%) had lymphoma, and each of the other 10 had another different cancer. (1) Past experiences. Patients reported discussing concerns with their physicians about RA symptoms, the impact of RA treatment on RA, adverse events, interactions between RA and oncologic therapies, and discontinuation of RA treatment after cancer diagnosis. Most patients felt their concerns were addressed after the discussion with their providers. (2) Beliefs and attitudes. Few patients were concerned about the risk of cancer development or recurrence with RA treatment, and some mentioned lymphoma risk with biologics. Patients were concerned about the impact of cancer treatment on RA, RA flare-ups, and suppression of their immune system. (3) Decision making process. Most patients felt decisions were shared with their providers including discontinuing, changing, or adding new drugs. Most common decision facilitators included discussions with their physicians and their own previous experiences. Most patients would consider taking a drug to improve RA even if the effect on cancer were unknown. Informational needs included the following areas: (i) adverse events and efficacy of drugs, (ii) drug interactions, (iii) impact of RA drugs on cancer, and (iv) costs. With respect to delivery of information, many patients, but not all, found other patients’ testimonials helpful. Preferred types and formats for information included pictures, graphs, and numerical information (e.g. probabilities) on benefits and harms. Various modes of delivery were identified such as mailings, emails, websites, electronic medical records, videos, and through discussion with providers.

Conclusion: We identified important aspects related to the preferences, concerns, and informational needs in the treatment decision making process of patients with RA and cancer. Discussions with physicians were the most important factor to make decisions about RA treatment, but patients also identified other potential sources of information that could aid in this process.


Disclosures: J. Ruiz: None; S. Madramootoo: None; M. Lopez-Olivo: None; N. Singh: None; M. Suarez-Almazor: Celgene, 1, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Syneos Health, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ruiz J, Madramootoo S, Lopez-Olivo M, Singh N, Suarez-Almazor M. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Preferences of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Concomitant Cancer with Respect to RA Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/beliefs-attitudes-and-preferences-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-and-concomitant-cancer-with-respect-to-ra-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/beliefs-attitudes-and-preferences-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-and-concomitant-cancer-with-respect-to-ra-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology