ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2886

Associations Between Type I Interferon and Antiphospholipid Antibody Status Differ Between Ancestral Backgrounds

Taro Iwamoto1, Meenakshi Jolly2 and Timothy B. Niewold3, 1Division of Rheumatology and Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Rush, Chicago, IL, 3Rheumatology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: antiphospholipid antibodies and interferons, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Human Etiology and Pathogenesis - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Autoantibodies in SLE that bind to double-stranded DNA or RNA-binding proteins are strongly associated with high levels of type I interferon (IFN), likely via their ability these antibodies to form nucleic-acid containing immune complexes that can stimulate Toll-like receptors. In this study, we examine whether anti-phospholipid antibodies, which should not have this capacity, are associated with greater type I interferon in SLE patients.

Methods:   We studied 392 SLE patients (223 African-American, 101 European-American, and 68 Hispanic-American ancestry) and measured type I IFN in sera. Antiphospholipid (APL), anti-RBP, and anti-dsDNA antibodies were measured in the clinical laboratory, and standard clinical cut-offs were used to define a positive result. Non-parametric analyses were used to compare IFN data with the antibody data in each ancestral background.

Results:   African-American subjects with a positive IgG APL antibody test had higher type I IFN levels than those without APL antibodies (p=0.02). This was not observed in the other ancestral backgrounds, and in fact the opposite trend was observed in Hispanic-Americans. African-Americans were less likely to have a positive IgG APL test than European-Americans (p=0.0067, OR=2.3), and those African-Americans with a positive IgG APL test were more likely to also have anti-dsDNA antibodies (p=0.04, OR=2.5).

Conclusion:   These data suggest a distinct serological profile in African-American patients, in which a positive APL antibody test corresponds with a significantly greater type I IFN level and more frequent anti-dsDNA antibodies, and this is not shared with other ancestral backgrounds. These data support differences in the molecular pathogenesis of SLE by ancestral background that may impact treatment strategies.


Disclosure: T. Iwamoto, None; M. Jolly, Pfizer Inc, 9; T. B. Niewold, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Iwamoto T, Jolly M, Niewold TB. Associations Between Type I Interferon and Antiphospholipid Antibody Status Differ Between Ancestral Backgrounds [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/associations-between-type-i-interferon-and-antiphospholipid-antibody-status-differ-between-ancestral-backgrounds/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/associations-between-type-i-interferon-and-antiphospholipid-antibody-status-differ-between-ancestral-backgrounds/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology