ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0637

Assessing the Rates of Cervical Cancer Screening in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Tara Skorupa1, Sonia Khatter2, Alana Freifeld1 and Elena Weinstein3, 1University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 2University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 3University of Colorado, Englewood, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: quality of care, rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster (0623–0659)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Prior studies have described increased incidence of cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting that these populations are at higher risk due to their disease state, their immunosuppressive medications, or both. The current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend cervical cancer screening in women ages 21-65 years at intervals of 3-5 years based on age and HPV co-testing. Our aim was to assess the proportion of women with SLE and RA with documented cervical cancer screening per these guidelines.

Methods: This was a single-system retrospective chart review of women ages 21-65 years with SLE and RA. Included patients had a rheumatologist and primary care provider (PCP) within our university health system. For each patient, we documented the date and result of last Pap smear. We calculated each patient’s age at last Pap smear, and for patients ages 21-29, we assessed for Pap smear within the last 3 years. For thoses ages 30-65, we assessed for Pap smear within 3 years or within 5 years with HPV cotesting. We excluded those with hysterectomy for non-cervical cancer reasons, and analyzed the proportion of remaining patients with abnormal cervical cancer screening results.

Results: Of the 371 patients included in the final analysis (Figure 1), 285 (76.8%) had age-appropriate cervical cancer screening documented in the medical record per USPSTF guidelines, compared to 81% of all women nationally. 50 of the 371 patients (13%) had no prior cervical cancer screening data available in the chart. Of all 371 patients, last documented Pap smear was abnormal in 28 (7.5%). Of those patients, 18 had a positive HPV test. 3 rheumatology providers had ever documented the status of last Pap smear, and none documented counseling on cervical cancer screening.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that PCPs within our health system screen for cervical cancer in patients with SLE and RA at rates similar to the national average for all women. We acknowledge that our data may be underestimating the true number for our patients, as 13% had no prior documented Pap smear in the system. The current national average for cervical cancer screening is suboptimal, but it is even more unacceptable in patients with SLE and RA given their increased risk for cervical dysplasia. One barrier may be insufficient education about the association between these disease states and cervical cancer risk. We propose that there is an underutilized role for rheumatologists in educating patients and their PCPs about risk mitigation.

Figure 1. Patients included in the final analysis.


Disclosures: T. Skorupa, None; S. Khatter, None; A. Freifeld, None; E. Weinstein, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Skorupa T, Khatter S, Freifeld A, Weinstein E. Assessing the Rates of Cervical Cancer Screening in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-rates-of-cervical-cancer-screening-in-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-rates-of-cervical-cancer-screening-in-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology