ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2886

Assessing Rheumatology Fellows’ Teaching Skills Using the Objective Structured Teaching Exercise (OSTE)

Eli M. Miloslavsky1, Marcy B. Bolster1, Kenneth S. O'Rourke2 and Lisa G. Criscione-Schreiber3, 1Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Section on Rheum & Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 3Rheumatology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: consults and education, Fellow-In-Training, medical

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Education

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

The interaction between rheumatology fellows and Internal Medicine residents in the setting of a consult offers an important opportunity for resident learning.  However, teaching in the setting of a consult interaction can be challenging due to time constraints and lack of a longitudinal relationship between the resident and fellow.  Fellows’ teaching skills in the setting of the consult interaction have not been evaluated.  We conducted a pilot study utilizing the Objective Structured Teaching Exercise (OSTE)1 to evaluate rheumatology fellows’ teaching skills. 

Methods

First and second year rheumatology fellows from 5 training programs participated in a one-station OSTE during a 7 station rheumatology Objective Structured Clinical Examination  (OSCE) in February 2014.  Following the OSCE format, fellows were given 10 minutes to teach a standardized resident in the setting of a simulated consult and relay their consult recommendations, followed by 2 minutes of feedback.  Prior to beginning the station fellows were given written instructions on the objectives of the exercise as well as a resident admission note describing the patient (32 year old male with monoarthritis).  The OSTE was proctored by 3 faculty members (including author [EMM]) and utilized 3 standardized residents.  Each fellow was evaluated by one faculty member and the standardized resident using an 8-point instrument adapted from a validated OSTE rating tool.1  Prior to the OSTE, faculty and standardized residents received written materials describing the station and the rating tool and underwent a 30-60 minute training.

Results

Nineteen rheumatology fellows participated in the OSTE (11 first years and 8 second years).  Fellows’ overall teaching effectiveness had a mean score of 3.75 out of 5 (Table).  Of seven specific skills evaluated, fellows were rated highest on their ability to present organized material.  The lowest rated skills were evaluating residents’ factual knowledge, evaluating residents’ ability to synthesize knowledge and giving feedback.  No differences in teaching skill ratings were detected between first and second year fellows.  Ratings of the two evaluators had a high degree of correlation for all items (0.85-1.0).

Skill evaluated

Average rating * (range)

Standard deviation

Listened to learner

3.95 (2-5)

0.90

Encouraged learner to participate actively in the discussion

3.75 (2-5)

0.95

Evaluated learner’s knowledge of factual medical information

3.53 (1-5)

1.15

Evaluated learner’s ability to analyze or synthesize knowledge

3.18 (1-5)

0.93

Presented well organized material

4.00 (2-5)

0.71

Paced the session well

3.92 (2-5)

0.70

Explained to learner why he/she was correct/incorrect

3.38 (1-5)

0.96

Overall teaching effectiveness

3.75 (2-5)

0.91

* Scores ranged from “1” as the lowest rating to “5” as the highest rating

Conclusion

Rheumatology fellows may benefit from programs designed to improve their teaching skills, particularly in the consult setting where time pressure and lack of a longitudinal relationship with learners impede the teaching interaction.  Such interventions should focus on improving fellows’ ability to engage in learner-centered teaching and feedback.  Our pilot study suggests that the OSTE may be a useful tool in assessing fellows’ teaching skills.

References

1. Morrison EH, Rucker L, Boker JR, Gabbert CC, Hubbell FA, Hitchcock MA, Prislin MD. The effect of a 13-hour curriculum to improve residents’ teaching skills: a randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 17;141(4):257-63 


Disclosure:

E. M. Miloslavsky,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5;

M. B. Bolster,

ACR Committee on Training and Workforce,

9,

ABIM Rheumatology Subspecialty Board,

9,

ABIM Rheumatology Test-Writing Committee,

9,

ACR Board of Directors RRF Board of Directors,

9;

K. S. O’Rourke,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

American Board of Internal Medicine,

9,

InPractice Rheumatology,

9;

L. G. Criscione-Schreiber,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-rheumatology-fellows-teaching-skills-using-the-objective-structured-teaching-exercise-oste/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology