ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0393

Are We Meeting Patients’ Treatment Goals with Guideline-Based Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis?

Christeen Samuel1, Laura Prichett1, Thomas Grader-Beck1, Uzma Haque1, John Miller1, Suzanne Grieb2 and Ana-Maria Orbai3, 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Disease Activity, Fatigue, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, skin

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Treatment success from the patients’ perspective has not been defined in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective was to determine prevalence and associations of patient-reported treatment success in PsA.

Methods: Consecutive patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA, meeting the CASPAR classification, were recruited from a single center. The intervention was PsA guideline-based standard of care, which is defined as a review of disease activity and medication safety every 3-6 months and adjustment of therapy to meet treatment targets of low disease activity or remission (1-3). PsA outcome measures collected included: 68/66 tender/swollen joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC enthesitis indices, Leeds dactylitis index, psoriasis body surface area, patient reported outcomes (patient global, pain, PROMIS-29 Profile and additional short forms) and the patient acceptable treatment state (PASS). Treatment targets using DAPSA and MDA were calculated. The study primary outcome was a single-item question that assessed the patient’s impression of treatment success: “Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?” with response options Yes/No. A “No” choice branched to a drop-down list of reasons patients could select. Treatment success groups were compared using Student-t, Wilcoxon and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results: A total of 106 participants had a baseline visit. Mean(SD) CASPAR score was 3.9 (1.0), mean age 51(13) years, mean BMI 31(7), 51% women, and 87% Caucasian. Seventy-two (68%) reported treatment success, and versus not, had significantly lower tender/swollen joint counts, dactylitis, psoriasis, and were more likely at treatment target by DAPSA and MDA; they also had better quality of life according to PROMIS-29 domains (Table 1a and b). Demographics and BMI were not associated with patient-reported treatment success. The most common reasons patients chose for treatment failure were pain (24%), psoriasis (15%), fatigue (12%) and decreased ability to be physically active (9%) (Table 3).

Conclusion: Patient-reported treatment success in PsA was associated with control of arthritis, dactylitis, psoriasis, and health-related quality of life. The top three patient-reported reasons for treatment failure were pain, psoriasis and fatigue.

References 1. Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, Gladman DD, Deal C, Deodhar A, et al. Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:5–32.
2. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, Wit M de, McInnes I, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700–712.
3. Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Merola JF, Smolen J, Mens LJJ van, Bertheussen H, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis/Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Consensus-Based Recommendations and Research Agenda for Use of Composite Measures and Treatment Targets in Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:345–355.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient and disease characteristics (continuous variables)

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Patient and disease characteristics (count variables)

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Reasons for therapy failure


Disclosures: C. Samuel, None; L. Prichett, None; T. Grader-Beck, None; U. Haque, None; J. Miller, None; S. Grieb, None; A. Orbai, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Janssen, UCB.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Samuel C, Prichett L, Grader-Beck T, Haque U, Miller J, Grieb S, Orbai A. Are We Meeting Patients’ Treatment Goals with Guideline-Based Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-we-meeting-patients-treatment-goals-with-guideline-based-therapy-for-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-we-meeting-patients-treatment-goals-with-guideline-based-therapy-for-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology