ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2148

Analysis of Serum Proteomics Data Identifies Beta-Defensin 2 as a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Response to IL-17 Blockade in Psoriatic Arthritis

Mathias Cardner1, Danny Tuckwell2, Anna Kostikova2, Pascal Forrer3, Richard Siegel2, Alain Marti3, Marc Vandemeulebroecke3 and Enrico Ferrero2, 1Novartis Global Drug Development and Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland, 2Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland, 3Novartis Global Drug Development, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biomarkers, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, TH17 Cells

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: PsA

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Despite several effective targeted therapies, biomarkers that predict whether a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) will respond to a particular treatment are currently lacking.

Methods: We analysed proteomics data from serum samples of nearly two thousand PsA patients in placebo-controlled phase-III clinical trials of the IL-17A blocking mAb secukinumab, using the SomaScan platform. To discover predictive biomarkers of clinical response, we used statistical learning with controlled feature selection. The top candidate was validated using an ELISA and was separately assessed in a trial of almost eight hundred PsA patients treated with the anti-IL-17A mAb secukinumab or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

Results: A statistical learning model trained on the FUTURE 1, 3, 4, and 5 studies of secukinumab in PsA (n=1626) identified serum levels of the anti-microbial peptide beta-defensin 2 (BD-2) at baseline as the only serum protein predictive of ACR20 response to secukinumab but not placebo. SERPINA10 was prognostic of ACR20 but not predictive of response to sekukinumab. Baseline BD-2, but not SERPINA10, was validated in an independent test data set from the FUTURE 2 trial (Figure 1B) adding 11 percentage points to the predictive performance (ROC AUC) of a logistic regression model based on clinical predictors (Fig 1C). Although BD-2 is known to be associated with psoriasis severity, the predictivity of BD-2 was independent of baseline PASI. The association between BD-2 and ACR20 response to secukinumab was observed as early as 4 weeks and maintained up to 52 weeks (Fig 1D). Validation and quantification of BD-2 by ELISA allowed modelling a classification tree showing that baseline BD-2 is the most important factor in predicting response, and that the subset of patients with higher levels of BD-2 at baseline are highly enriched for responders to secukinumab (76%, Fig 2A). BD-2 prediction of response was enhanced in TNF-IR patients (Fig 2B), and also significantly predictive of ACR50 and 70 responses (Table 1). Analysis of samples from the EXCEED trial which compared adalimumab to sekukinumab treatment in PsA showed that BD-2 was also predictive of response to treatment with a TNFi, though this was not sustained longitudinally as it was for secukinumab. Analysis across three treatment trials showed that BD-2 levels were not significantly predictive of response to secukinumab in RA.

Conclusion: BD-2 is a novel, PsA-specific predictive biomarker of clinical arthritis response to secukinumab. Patients with high levels of BD-2 at baseline reach and sustain higher rates of clinical response after treatment with secukinumab.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Statistical learning based on SomaScan data identified BD_2 as a predictive biomarker of ACR20 response to secukinumab after 16 weeks of treatment. The discovery was made in the training set (panel A) and confirmed in the test set (panels B and C). A) The selection probability reflects how often a given variable was included in the underlying elastic-net regression model as a function of the regularisation step (where higher means stricter penalisation). Only variables passing stability selection are labelled. Asterisks denote secukinumab-specific variables, and the only predictive candidate was BD_2 (encoded by the gene DEFB4A). B) Box and violin plots of baseline BD_2 levels in serum in the test set, as measured by the corresponding SOMAmer. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess differences in BD_2 distributions between ACR20 responders and non-responders, with the resulting p-values above the indicated comparison. C) Logistic regression models trained to predict ACR20 response after 16 weeks of secukinumab treatment were evaluated by ROC curves in the test set. The AUC of each model is reported under the diagonal. The clinical model incorporated sekukinumab dose level, prior exposure and response to TNF inhibitors, subject weight, and concomitant use of methotrexate D) Longitudinal response in patients with above/below median BD_2 levels at baseline. Mean rates are banded by 95% confidence intervals. Placebo arms are shown until the 16th week visit since non-responding patients were switched to secukinumab at that point.
Abbreviations: relative fluorescence unit (RFU), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the curve (AUC).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. ELISA validation of BD_2 in FUTURE 1, 2, 3, and 5, with identification of a BD_2 cut-off for ACR20 response prediction. A) A classification tree shows the optimal splits for response prediction. The colored circle nodes indicate the response predicted by the tree. Below each node the response rate in the indicated subgroup is shown in bold next to a rectangle with a corresponding height and colour. The proportion of the cohort falling into each subgroup determines the width of the corresponding rectangle and is reported below in italics. B) Response rates with 95% confidence intervals in patients with baseline BD_2 < vs ≥ 3961 pg/mL, shown per study and TNFi stratum: naïve or inadequate responder (IR).

Supporting image 3

Table 1. Odds ratios of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response in patients with baseline BD_2 ≥ 3961 pg/mL, as compared with BD_2 < 3961 pg/mL. Reported in parenthesis are 95% confidence intervals along with asterisks indicating p-values below 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**) and 0.001 (***). Statistics are based on 1648 patients across FUTURE 1, 2, 3, and 5.


Disclosures: M. Cardner, Novartis; D. Tuckwell, Novartis; A. Kostikova, Novartis; P. Forrer, Novartis; R. Siegel, Novartis; A. Marti, Novartis; M. Vandemeulebroecke, Novartis; E. Ferrero, Novartis.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cardner M, Tuckwell D, Kostikova A, Forrer P, Siegel R, Marti A, Vandemeulebroecke M, Ferrero E. Analysis of Serum Proteomics Data Identifies Beta-Defensin 2 as a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Response to IL-17 Blockade in Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analysis-of-serum-proteomics-data-identifies-beta-defensin-2-as-a-predictive-biomarker-of-clinical-response-to-il-17-blockade-in-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analysis-of-serum-proteomics-data-identifies-beta-defensin-2-as-a-predictive-biomarker-of-clinical-response-to-il-17-blockade-in-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology