ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2112

Analysis of Gout Subjects Receiving Lesinurad and Allopurinol Combination Therapy By Baseline Renal Function

Kenneth G. Saag1, Thomas Bardin2, Alexander So3,4, Puja Khanna5, Chris Storgard6, Scott Baumgartner7, Maple Fung7, Nihar Bhakta7, Scott Adler8, Jeff Kopicko7 and Michael A. Becker9, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France, 3Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4CHU Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Division of Rheumatology/Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 64939 Directors Place, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 7Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 8AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE, 9University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Allopurinol, gout, hyperuricemia, tophaceous gout and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I: Therapeutics

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Two randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials showed that lesinurad
(200 or 400 mg) when added to allopurinol (200-900 mg) significantly increased
the proportion of gout patients achieving the serum uric acid (sUA) target of <6.0
mg/dL by Month 6, representing an approximate 2-fold increase with lesinurad 200
mg compared with allopurinol alone. Lesinurad was generally well tolerated,
particularly at the 200 mg dose, where the safety profile was comparable to allopurinol
alone, with the exception of a higher incidence in predominately reversible serum
creatinine (sCr) elevations. As renal
impairment and gout frequently coexist, the objective of the current pooled analysis
was to explore efficacy and safety endpoints in gout patients based on baseline
renal function.

Methods: Patient data were combined from 2 Phase III clinical
studies examining the efficacy and safety of lesinurad, a selective uric acid
reabsorption inhibitor (SURI), in combination with standard of care allopurinol
(200-900 mg) (CLEAR 1 [NCT01510158], CLEAR 2 [NCT01493531]). In current
analyses, patients were analyzed by baseline renal function using estimated creatinine
clearance (eCrCl; Cockcroft-Gault formula using ideal body weight): <60, <90,
and ≥90 mL/min.

Results: In total, 1208 patients were included in the analyses. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, race,
weight, and BMI, were broadly similar between patient groups stratified by baseline renal function. Efficacy,
assessed by the proportions of patients with sUA <6.0 mg/dL at 6 and 12
months, was consistently greater (P<0.05)
for both lesinurad doses (200 mg and 400 mg) than placebo in all groups assessed
by baseline renal function (Table). There were no
consistent differences in TEAE rates in patients based on baseline renal
function (Table). sCr elevations occurred at higher rates in the lesinurad
groups (particularly the 400 mg dose) versus placebo, without evident
differences when analyzed by baseline renal function.

Conclusion: These combined analyses
from 2 Phase III studies indicate that lesinurad in combination with
allopurinol provides consistent, significant efficacy across all renal function
groups. Safety findings were consistent between treatment groups across all
renal function categories.

Table:
Efficacy and safety endpoints in CLEAR 1 and CLEAR 2 combined: stratification
by baseline eCrCl <60, <90, and ≥90 mL/min

Baseline eCrCl

<60 mL/min

<90 mL/min

≥90 mL/min

PBO

+XOI

(n=80)

LESU200 mg

+XOI

(n=74)

LESU400 mg

+XOI

(n=70)

PBO

+XOI

(n=256)

LESU200 mg

+XOI

(n=241)

LESU400 mg

+XOI

(n=238)

PBO

+XOI

(n=149)

LESU200 mg

+XOI

(n=163)

LESU400 mg

+XOI

(n=161)

Efficacy endpoints (n, % patients)

Proportion with sUA <6.0 mg/dL at Month 6 (LOCF)

26/77

(33.8)

44/74

(59.5)

46/69

(66.7)

83/249

(33.3)

149/235

(63.4)

161/236

(68.2)

31/145

(21.4)

96/159

(60.4)

112/159

(70.4)

Proportion with sUA <6.0 mg/dL at Month 12 (LOCF)

26/77

(33.8)

39/74

(52.7)

37/69

(53.6)

81/249

(32.5)

138/235

(58.7)

149/236

(63.1)

39/145

(26.9)

95/15

(59.7)

100/159

(62.9)

Safety endpoints (n, % patients)

Any TEAE

58/80

(72.5)

63/74

(85.1)

57/70

(81.4)

182/256

(71.1)

178/241

(73.9)

191/238

(80.3)

102/149

(68.5)

120/163

(73.6)

125/161

(77.6)

sCr elevation ≥1.5x

2/80

(2.5)

5/74

(6.8)

9/70

(12.9)

3/256

(1.2)

15/241

(6.2)

40/238

(16.8)

6/149

(4.0)

9/163

(5.5)

22/161

(13.7)

Unresolved*cases of sCr elevation ≥1.5x as of last study visit

1

1

2

1

2

4

2

0

1

sCr elevation ≥2.0x

0/80

(0)

0/74

(0)

3/70

(4.3)

0/256

(0)

1/241

(0.4)

18/238

(7.6)

0/149

(0)

5/163

(3.1)

10/161

(6.2)

Unresolved* cases of sCr elevation ≥2.0x as of last study visit

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

*sCr resolution: sCr value returned to ≤1.2x baseline.
LESU, lesinurad; PBO, placebo; LOCF, last observation carried forward.


Disclosure: K. G. Saag, Amgen, 2,Eli Lilly and Company, 2,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 2,Amgen, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 5; T. Bardin, Ispen, 2,Menarini, 2,AstraZeneca, 5,Ispen, 5,Menarini, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Savient, 5,Sobi, 5,Takeda, 5; A. So, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,AstraZeneca, 5,Menarini, 5; P. Khanna, Takeda, 8; C. Storgard, Ardea Biosciences, 3; S. Baumgartner, Ardea Biosciences, 3; M. Fung, Ardea Biosciences, 3; N. Bhakta, Ardea Biosciences, 3; S. Adler, AstraZeneca, 3; J. Kopicko, Ardea Biosciences, 3; M. A. Becker, AstraZeneca, 5,BioCryst, 5,Metabolex, 5,Savient, 5,Takeda, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saag KG, Bardin T, So A, Khanna P, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, Fung M, Bhakta N, Adler S, Kopicko J, Becker MA. Analysis of Gout Subjects Receiving Lesinurad and Allopurinol Combination Therapy By Baseline Renal Function [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analysis-of-gout-subjects-receiving-lesinurad-and-allopurinol-combination-therapy-by-baseline-renal-function/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analysis-of-gout-subjects-receiving-lesinurad-and-allopurinol-combination-therapy-by-baseline-renal-function/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology