ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1611

A Population-Based Evaluation of Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction in SLE Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Atlanta, Georgia

Sarah Simmons1, Cristina Drenkard2, Gaobin Bao2, Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas2, Kim Schofield2 and S Sam Lim3, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: COVID-19, Patient reported outcomes, race/ethnicity, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster IV: COVID-19 (1589–1613)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the shift from in-person physician appointments to the development and proliferation of the use of telemedicine in an attempt to give comparable levels of care despite social distancing and travel restrictions. It is unclear how patients with SLE, particularly from minority communities, used and perceived telemedicine during this time.

Methods: Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) is a population-based cohort of adult, validated SLE patients in Atlanta. GOAL participants were surveyed by internet, mail, and/or phone from January 19, 2021 through March 25, 2021. Survey questions covered sociodemographics and use and perceptions of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequency of responses were reported overall and by sex, race, age group, and work status. Differences within groups were evaluated using t-tests and P-values. The 21-item Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire (TSUQ) measures usefulness, effectiveness, ease of use, attitude, intention to use, and compares telemedicine to in-person visits. Each question uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Being in agreement equated to a score of 4 or 5. Questions that showed significance in univariable analysis by race, age at survey, disease duration, sex, and poverty status were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 732 participants had an average age of 51.4 years with a disease duration of 18.2 years (Table 1). Most were female (93.3%) and self-identified as Black (78.1%) with 26.8% living at or below the Federal poverty level. Although 40.3% were employed, 36.5% were unemployed and 23.3% were off the work force (disabled, retired, student, homemaker). Black participants were more frequently in poverty (32.1 vs. 8.3%) and less likely employed. The youngest age group (18-34) lived in poverty most frequently and the oldest (55+) was the least employed. A total of 74% of respondents had a telemedicine visit during the pandemic with 90% having an adequate internet connection (Table 2). Most connected from home. There were no differences by race, age group, and work status. Smartphones with cameras were used more often by Blacks and younger participants Laptops were also used more frequently by younger and employed individuals. There were no significant differences between males and females in any category (Tables 1 and 2). Multivariable logistic regression (Table 3) showed that Blacks were more involved in their care, followed their doctor’s advice better, and more satisfied with talking to a nurse. Not being in poverty was associated with being satisfied with telemedicine and finding video visits as convenient. However, those in poverty followed their doctor’s advice better. Younger age was associated with higher satisfaction with telemedicine.

Conclusion: In this diverse SLE cohort, telemedicine was widely used during the pandemic. Blacks felt more involved in their care, and Blacks and those in poverty followed their doctor’s advice better using telemedicine. Telemedicine may potentially offer an opportunity to mitigate health disparities through the pandemic and beyond.


Disclosures: S. Simmons, None; C. Drenkard, GSK, 1, 5; G. Bao, None; C. Dunlop-Thomas, None; K. Schofield, None; S. Lim, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, ACR, 4, AstraZeneca, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Simmons S, Drenkard C, Bao G, Dunlop-Thomas C, Schofield K, Lim S. A Population-Based Evaluation of Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction in SLE Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Atlanta, Georgia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-population-based-evaluation-of-telemedicine-use-and-satisfaction-in-sle-patients-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-atlanta-georgia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-population-based-evaluation-of-telemedicine-use-and-satisfaction-in-sle-patients-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-atlanta-georgia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology