ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2008

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Mechanistic Insight and Dosage Optimization Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dazodalibep (VIB4920/HZN4920) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Having Inadequate Response to Conventional/Biological DMARDs

Alan Kivitz1, Liangwei Wang2, Ilias Alevizos2, Michele Gunsior2, Judith Falloon2 and Gabor Illei3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 2Horizon Therapeutics, Gaithersburg, MD, 3Horizon Therapeutics, Rockville, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Inflammation, Randomized Trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster IV

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Dazodalibep (DAZ), a non-antibody biologic antagonist of CD40L, led to higher/durable response rates vs. placebo (PBO) in a double-blind, Phase 1b trial of patients (pts) with active RA (1). We continued assessment of DAZ in a Phase 2 study of safety, efficacy, and response duration of 4 dosing regimens of DAZ in pts with RA.

Methods: This double-blind study (NCT04163991) included adult pts with active moderate-severe RA (DAS28-CRP > 3.2, ≥ 4 tender and ≥ 4 swollen joints), positive for serum RF and/or ACPA with inadequate response to MTX, conventional/biological DMARDs or anti-TNFα, with no prior treatment with B-cell depleting agents. Pts were randomized equally to 5 cohorts to receive 4 infusions of DAZ or PBO (in 2, 3 and 4, PBO was given on dosing days when DAZ was not administered):

1: DAZ 1500 mg IV Q2Wx3, last dose 4W after
2: DAZ 1500 mg IV Q8Wx2
3: DAZ 3000 mg IV Q8Wx2
4: DAZ 3000 mg IVx1
5: PBO IV Q2Wx3, last dose 4W after

The primary endpoint (EP) was the change from baseline (BL) in DAS28-CRP at Day (d) 113. Secondary EPs included proportion with clinical remission (CR) by DAS28-CRP < 2.6 at d113, time-to-rescue medication, change from BL in RF/ACPAs at d113, treatment-emergent adverse events (AE), serious AE (SAE) and AE of special interest (AESI). Pts were followed until d309.

Results: A total of 78 pts were randomized and received study medication, with 73 (94%) having completed treatment and 65 (83%) having completed the study follow-up to d309. At BL, the mean (SD) age was 56 (13) yrs, and 80% were female. Demographics/disease characteristics were generally similar across arms, except for RF+ proportion and mean CRP. Significant reductions in DAS28-CRP were observed at all doses of active drug at d113 vs. PBO (table). Significant reductions were also observed at all doses at d309; in cohort 3, significant reduction was observed at all post-dose timepoints after d113 (figure). RF levels decreased significantly vs. PBO starting d57 to d113 (p≤0.0035) for all doses. There was a similar trend with ACPA levels that was significant in cohorts 1 and 4. DAS28-CRP CR rates were low and similar in all groups, but fewer DAZ pts had high disease activity (DAS28-CRP >5.1) at d113. Few patients received rescue medication (none before d113), and time-to-rescue medication did not differ between DAZ and PBO.

The % of pts with ≥1AE was higher with DAZ vs. PBO (74% vs. 63%). There were 4 SAEs in 3 pts in DAZ groups vs. 0 in PBO: 1 nephrolithiasis, 1 COVID-19 infection, and 1 pt hospitalized for COVID-19 who died from unknown cause 2d after discharge (232d after last dose); all SAEs were deemed by investigators to be unrelated to study drug. In total, 11/62 (18%) vs. 4/16 (25%) pts had ≥1AE deemed related to DAZ and PBO, respectively.

Conclusion: DAZ reduced DAS28-CRP and RF significantly vs. PBO at d113 in all dose regimens. Safety and tolerability were consistent with previous observations. Treatment effects at d113 and the prolonged duration of responses support the possibility of long dosing intervals.

References:

1. Karnell JL, Albulescu M, Drabic S, Wang L, Moate R, Baca M, et al. A CD40L-targeting protein reduces autoantibodies and improves disease activity in patients with autoimmunity. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(489).

Supporting image 1

Table: Baseline, Efficacy and Safety Data

Supporting image 2

Figure: Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Through End of Study (d309)


Disclosures: A. Kivitz, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Flexion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, UCB, AbbVie, Merck, ECOR1 CAPITAL, LLC, Chemocentryx, Regenerson, Grunenthal, Bendcare, Horizon; L. Wang, Horizon Therapeutics; I. Alevizos, Horizon Therapeutics; M. Gunsior, Horizon Therapeutics; J. Falloon, Horizon Therapeutics, Horizon Therapeutics; G. Illei, Horizon Therapeutics.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kivitz A, Wang L, Alevizos I, Gunsior M, Falloon J, Illei G. A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Mechanistic Insight and Dosage Optimization Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dazodalibep (VIB4920/HZN4920) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Having Inadequate Response to Conventional/Biological DMARDs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-mechanistic-insight-and-dosage-optimization-study-of-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-dazodalibep-vib4920-hzn4920-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthr/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-mechanistic-insight-and-dosage-optimization-study-of-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-dazodalibep-vib4920-hzn4920-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthr/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology