ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 674

A Novel Strategy to  Identify and Evaluate Approved Drugs and Treatments for Repositioning As Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Peter E. Lipsky, Matthew Ryals, Jacob Smearman, Victoria Soler and Amrie Grammer, AMPEL BioSolutions, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug therapy and drug treatment, Lupus, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Development of new SLE treatments has been slow with only one new treatment approved in the past half century. One way to increase the availability of new therapies for SLE is to consider repositioning agents that have been approved for other indications. The goal of this project was to identify possible therapies that might be useful as therapies for lupus among the hundreds of agents approved for human use.

Methods: Initially, a comprehensive strategy was developed to identify all possible SLE therapies within FDA approved drugs and therapies. First, the lupus community was engaged via a social media site (www.linkedin.com/in/lrxlstat) and queried for recommendations. Secondly, the reported actions of all drugs approved for human used were cross-referenced with a database of known pathway abnormalities in SLE. Finally a comprehensive search of all drugs and therapies showing benefit in murine models of SLE was carried out. After the initial Lupus Treatment List (LRxL) was assembled, a structured research of the available literature on each drug and therapy was carried out focusing on mechanism of action, relevant experience in animals and humans, drug properties and adverse events. Finally, a comprehensive scoring system was developed and employed to score ten features of each drug or therapy on a 28 point scale. Face validity of this scoring system was assessed by ranking available lupus therapies and questioning rheumatologists for their response.

Results: Of the more than 1100 new chemical entities approved by the FDA for 6800 indications, 157 were identified as possible treatments for SLE.  All drugs widely used for lupus or known to be in development for lupus by Pharma/Biotech were excluded. Of the 157 therapies initially screened, more than 25 have an appropriate set of characteristics to consider for testing in clinical trials in lupus, including drugs targeting cellular metabolism, kinases, cytokines, immune cell function and regulation, HDACs, complement as well as cellular therapies & non-drug/cell interventions.

Conclusion: This approach has demonstrated that there are numerous FDA-approved candidates for repositioning as new therapies for SLE. Not only have unique treatments that could be useful in SLE and possibly other autoimmune/inflammatory conditions been identified, but a rigorous evidence-based process has been delineated by which therapies can be objectively rated for possible clinical application to treat these conditions, thereby miti


Disclosure:

P. E. Lipsky,
None;

M. Ryals,
None;

J. Smearman,
None;

V. Soler,
None;

A. Grammer,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-strategy-to-identify-and-evaluate-approved-drugs-and-treatments-for-repositioning-as-therapies-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology