ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1152

A Follow-Up Evaluation of a Longstanding Telephone Peer Counseling Service for People with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Loved Ones

Priscilla Toral, Roberta Horton and Jillian Rose, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Community programs, education, patient, psychosocial factors, Social support, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Patient Education/Community Programs Poster (1150–1152)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: With technology rapidly evolving, studies still reinforce the value of telephone peer support for people living with chronic illness. A follow-up evaluation was conducted with participants of a national phone peer counseling service. Ongoing since 1988, this service provides emotional support & education for people with SLE & their loved ones. The program’s evolution has been presented at prior ACR meetings, including the psychosocial impact of the service on the volunteers themselves.

Methods: A 62-item online survey, with Likert scale & open-ended questions was administered to callers who used the service for > 6 months during 2020-2021.The survey assessed overall satisfaction & impact, including the relationship/satisfaction with the peer counselor match. Other areas assessed included specific changes in feelings & actions taken as a result of the service.

Results: Of 43 users outreached to, 29 (67%) completed the survey. Most (89%) respondents were female, 28% identified as Black/African-American, 40% White, 23% Hispanic & 20% some other race. Callers’ ages ranged from 30-80 with 78% ages 30-59. 52% were employed/self-employed & 19% were unable to work. All respondents had SLE mean year since diagnosis was 12.

Almost all (93%) identified emotional support & coping/SLE management as their initial reasons for calling. When asked about initial expectations of their counselor, callers shared “to gain information & receive emotional support.” Most callers (86%) agreed these expectations were met. When asked how their peer counselor met these expectations, participants shared: “non-judgmental & knowledgeable about SLE”. About half (45%) had ˃ 12 calls with their peer counselor; 97% were very satisfied/satisfied with their match.

Regarding coping, 82% indicated they have coped better with their SLE since using the service & 74% agreed they had a better understanding of SLE. When asked about depression, 59% reported feeling less depressed since joining the service with most callers (81%) crediting the service for this change. Regarding anxiety, 70% reported feeling less anxious since using the service with 74% attributing this to the program. Most (89%) reported feeling less isolated with 78% crediting this to the service.

Over half (60%) indicated their communication with their doctor improved since using the service & 73% attributed this to the program. When asked about the single most helpful part of using the service responses included: “being connected to someone with lived experience with SLE” & “the consistency of the counselor & supervisor.” Almost all (96%) would recommend the service & 92% indicated they are very satisfied/satisfied with the service overall.

Conclusion: Despite limitations of a small sample size, results indicate ongoing satisfaction & positive impact, with slight increases since last evaluation in overall service satisfaction & peer match. Results point to the continued benefit of an accessible telephone support service that connects people with SLE & their loved ones to trained peers. The study highlights further opportunities for research on the impact of phone peer model programs, as traditional in person support forums are limited due to the pandemic.


Disclosures: P. Toral, None; R. Horton, None; J. Rose, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Toral P, Horton R, Rose J. A Follow-Up Evaluation of a Longstanding Telephone Peer Counseling Service for People with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Loved Ones [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-follow-up-evaluation-of-a-longstanding-telephone-peer-counseling-service-for-people-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-their-loved-ones/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-follow-up-evaluation-of-a-longstanding-telephone-peer-counseling-service-for-people-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-their-loved-ones/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology