ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2389

A Comparison of Patients with Older Onset vs. Younger Onset SLE: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Chelsea Guan1, Milad Heydari-Kamjani2, Keri Ann Pfeil1, Elleson Harper1, Lindsay Frumker3, Meghan Gump1 and Omer Pamuk2, 1University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 2University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 3University hospitals Cleveland medical center, Highland Heights, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biostatistics, Cohort Study, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2377–2436) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: SLE is a systemic autoimmune disease that can present at different ages and with various multiorgan complications. In this study, we aimed to analyze the differences in characteristics in patients with older onset SLE (age of diagnosis >50) and younger onset SLE (age of diagnosis 49).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using TriNetX, a global federated health research network that provides access to electronic medical records across large health care organizations (HCOs). Data was used from 99 different HCOs. Adult patients (>18 years of age) were divided into two cohorts, older and younger onset SLE, based on age of SLE diagnosis (ICD-10: M32.9). 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using 58 different baseline patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, medication usage, and serological profiles (Table 1 and Table 2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to examine differences in mortality between both cohorts.

Results: 62,242 patients were included in the older onset SLE cohort and 85,011 patients were included in the younger onset SLE cohort before propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, 45,733 patients were included in the older onset SLE and younger onset SLE cohorts respectively. Univariate analysis before matching showed several significant differences in characteristics between both cohorts (Table 1 and Table 2). After propensity score matching, the frequency of thrombocytopenia was higher in the younger onset SLE group compared to the older onset SLE cohort (p < 0.001), otherwise the frequency of SLE related comorbidities was not significantly different (Table 1). Patients in the younger onset SLE cohort had a higher frequency of positive anti-dsDNA (p < 0.001), positive anti-RNP (p < 0.001), and low complement C3 and C4 (p < 0.001) (Table 2). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of medications used (Table 2). Risk analysis showed that 4,658 (10.2%) of older onset SLE patients died and 1,896 (4.1%) of younger onset SLE patients died during the study period (7,000 days) (RR = 2.457, 95% CI 2.333, 2.587, p = < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that the older onset SLE group had a markedly lower survival probability at the end of the observation period (51.79%) compared to those diagnosed before age 49 (82.38%). The difference in survival between groups was statistically significant (log-rank test χ² = 1515.153, p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that older onset SLE was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 2.77; 95% CI: 2.63–2.92). The assumption of proportional hazards was met (χ² = 1.466, p = 0.226), supporting the validity of the model (Figure 1).

Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study suggests that younger onset SLE patients are more likely to develop thrombocytopenia, otherwise have no significant difference in the examined comorbidities. Patients with younger onset SLE are also more likely to have positive anti-dsDNA, positive anti-RNP, and hypocomplementemia. Medications used between younger and onset SLE patients are not significantly different. Patients with older onset SLE have a significantly increased risk of mortality.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Older Onset SLE Patients vs. Younger Onset SLE Patients

Supporting image 2Table 2. Serological Profiles and Medications Used in Older Onset SLE patients vs. Younger Onset SLE Patients

Supporting image 3Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis of Mortality in Older Onset SLE Patients vs. Younger Onset SLE Patients


Disclosures: C. Guan: None; M. Heydari-Kamjani: None; K. Pfeil: None; E. Harper: None; L. Frumker: None; M. Gump: None; O. Pamuk: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Guan C, Heydari-Kamjani M, Pfeil K, Harper E, Frumker L, Gump M, Pamuk O. A Comparison of Patients with Older Onset vs. Younger Onset SLE: A Retrospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-patients-with-older-onset-vs-younger-onset-sle-a-retrospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-patients-with-older-onset-vs-younger-onset-sle-a-retrospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology