ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0613

A Baseline Kidney Biopsy Is Not Always Feasible in Incident Lupus Nephritis: Insights From an Inception Cohort

Fadi Kharouf1, Pankti Mehta2, Qixuan Li3, Dafna D. Gladman4, Zahi Touma5 and Laura Whitall Garcia6, 1University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Toronto, Gladman Krembil Psoriatic Arthritis Research Program, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cohort Study, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0593–0640) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Baseline kidney biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing incident lupus nephritis (LN). However, in certain cases, obtaining a biopsy may not be feasible due to medical, technical, or patient-specific factors, resulting in a clinical diagnosis of LN. We aimed to evaluate differences in outcomes between biopsy-confirmed and clinically diagnosed LN cases to provide guidance in scenarios where a biopsy cannot be obtained.

Methods: This retrospective study included inception SLE patients from an observational cohort (2000–2024) who developed incident LN. Patient inclusion began in 2000 to reflect treatment changes associated with the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil. The outcomes assessed were: (1) complete proteinuria recovery (CPR) ( < 0.5 g/g) at one year; (2) progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), defined as eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m², dialysis, or kidney transplantation, or a sustained ≥30% eGFR decline; and (3) a composite adverse outcome, including infection, hospitalization, or death. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves. Comparisons between biopsy-confirmed and clinically diagnosed LN groups were assessed using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models, treating death as a competing risk for the first two outcomes. The models were adjusted for proteinuria as a potential confounder, as well as for imbalanced variables known to clinically impact the outcomes.

Results: 127 patients were included: 84 (66.1%) with biopsy-confirmed LN and 43 (33.9%) with clinically diagnosed LN). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Baseline differences were observed in age, proteinuria and albumin levels, SLEDAI-2K, and SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI). Outcomes are summarized in Table 2, and KM curves are provided in Figures 1A-C.< - CPR at 1 Year: Achieved in 58.4% of patients, with no significant differences between groups in rate (p=0.36) and time to event (p=0.81). Adjusted models indicated comparable risk (HR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.76–1.84).< - ESKD or ≥30% Decline in eGFR: Occurred in 22.4% of patients, with no significant differences between groups in rate (p=0.39), time to event (p=0.66), or risk (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.46–2.69).< - Composite Outcome: Occurred in 55.1% of the cohort, with no significant differences between groups in rate (p = 0.11), time to event (p = 0.60), or risk (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.56–1.74).

Conclusion: Clinically diagnosed incident LN, when treated according to standard-of-care protocols, shows comparable outcomes to biopsy-confirmed LN. While these findings may provide some reassurance, they apply specifically to cases where a baseline biopsy is not feasible and should not be interpreted as a challenge to current diagnostic standards.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: F. Kharouf: None; P. Mehta: None; Q. Li: None; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, UCB, 2, 5; Z. Touma: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Merck KgaA, 2, Novartis, 1, Roche, 2, Sarkana Pharma Inc, 2, UCB/Biopharma, 1, 2; L. Whitall Garcia: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kharouf F, Mehta P, Li Q, Gladman D, Touma Z, Whitall Garcia L. A Baseline Kidney Biopsy Is Not Always Feasible in Incident Lupus Nephritis: Insights From an Inception Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-baseline-kidney-biopsy-is-not-always-feasible-in-incident-lupus-nephritis-insights-from-an-inception-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-baseline-kidney-biopsy-is-not-always-feasible-in-incident-lupus-nephritis-insights-from-an-inception-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology