ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 214

Knee Instability and Advanced Function Decline in Persons with Knee Osteoarthritis

Leena Sharma1, Joan S. Chmiel1, Orit Almagor1, Kirsten Moisio1, Alison H. Chang2, Yunhui Zhang1, Laura Belisle1 and Karen W. Hayes1, 1Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 2Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: functional status, Knee, osteoarthritis and outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects: Imaging and Biomechanics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Knee instability in the setting of osteoarthritis (OA) encompasses a spectrum of symptoms and phenomena, including a feeling of low overall confidence in the knees, low confidence that the knees will not buckle or give way (buckling confidence), actual episodes of buckling, and excessive frontal plane motion.  Current treatment for knee OA does little to address instability.  Given the central role of the knee in weightbearing activity, confidence and buckling in particular may influence nature and intensity of activity, and could be important proximal factors in a chain of events leading to function decline and disability.  It is unclear whether these factors are more important to outcome than instability objectively measured during gait.  We hypothesized that overall confidence, buckling confidence, buckling, and excessive frontal plane motion during gait are each associated with poor 2-year function outcome.     

Methods

Persons with OA in at least one knee were queried at baseline about overall knee confidence using the KOOS question (how troubled are you by the lack of confidence in your knees, higher worse), buckling confidence (i.e., confidence that knees will not buckle or give way, higher better), and any knee buckling in the past 3 months, and underwent quantitative gait analysis (3-dimensional knee kinematics and kinetics during ambulation recorded using an 8-camera Digital Real-Time Eagle motion analysis system, and 6 AMTI force plates).  Physical function was assessed using the Late-Life Function Instrument – Advanced Lower Extremity Domain scaled score; quintiles were used to categorize these scores into groups.  Poor outcome was defined as moving into a worse function group or remaining in the 2 worst function groups between baseline and 2 years.  Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline instability measures, knee confidence and poor baseline-to-2-year function outcome, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

212 persons [163 (77%) women, mean age 65 (10, SD), BMI 28.5 (5.7)] comprised the sample.

98 (46%) had a poor outcome.  As shown in the Table, buckling in the past 3 months, buckling confidence, and overall knee confidence, but neither varus-valgus excursion nor maximal varus-valgus angular velocity during gait were associated with the outcome in univariate analyses.  In fully-adjusted models, these findings persisted (except for buckling confidence which approached significance).  Age and self-efficacy were also consistently associated with the outcome. 

Conclusion

Worse baseline overall knee confidence and recent buckling, but neither varus-valgus excursion nor angular velocity using quantitative gait analysis were associated with greater risk of poor 2-year function outcome.  Interventions to address confidence and buckling may improve outcome in knee OA.

 

TABLE.  Results from logistic regression models to evaluate associations of each instability variable with odds of a poor function outcome; unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). 

95% CIs that exclude 1 are statistically significant.

Instability variable

(baseline)

Unadjusted

OR (95% CI)

Fully adjusted*

OR (95% CI)

Varus-valgus excursion during gait

0.95 (0.85, 1.06)

1.01 (0.89, 1.15)

Maximum varus-valgus angular velocity during gait

0.99 (0.98, 1.01)

0.99 (0.97, 1.01)

Buckling, past 3 months (yes/no)

2.27 (1.28, 4.03)

2.05 (1.01, 4.16)

Confidence knees will not buckle (higher better, continuous)

0.63 (0.47, 0.85)

0.68 (0.46, 1.01)

Overall knee confidence (higher worse, continuous)

1.80 (1.27, 2.56)

1.66 (1.02, 2.70)

*adjusted for age, gender, BMI, pain (ICOAP), function self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, disease severity (K/L, worse of 2 knees), knee extensor strength (better of 2 knees)

 


Disclosure:

L. Sharma,
None;

J. S. Chmiel,
None;

O. Almagor,
None;

K. Moisio,
None;

A. H. Chang,
None;

Y. Zhang,
None;

L. Belisle,
None;

K. W. Hayes,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/knee-instability-and-advanced-function-decline-in-persons-with-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology