ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 989

Fcgamma Receptor IIb Facilitates Rapid Internalisation of Rituximab (type 1 anti-CD20 antibody) in B Cells from Patients with RA and SLE and Contributes to Less Efficient B Cell Lysis Than Type 2 Anti-CD20 Antibodies, in Vitro

Venkat Reddy1, Geraldine Cambridge2, David A. Isenberg3, Mark Cragg4 and Maria J. Leandro2, 1Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Building, 4th Floor, Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Antibody and Vaccine group, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University, Southampton, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Fc receptors, monoclonal antibodies, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: B cell Biology and Targets in Autoimmune Disease: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Related Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Incomplete B-cell depletion using rituximab (RTX) is associated with poor clinical response in some individuals with RA and SLE, in particular. However, the precise mechanisms of resistance to depletion with RTX (type1 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, mAbs) are poorly understood. Improving depletion may augment clinical response. Newer mAbs such as GA101 (type2) are more potent than RTX at deleting malignant B cells.  

Methods

We included 5 healthy controls (HC), 15 patients with RA and 16 with SLE. An in vitro autologous whole blood depletion assay was used to compare BHH2 (type2, glycosylated GA101) with RTX (type1) and B cell lysing potential of mAbs was defined as cytotoxicity index (CTI).  Briefly, 100μl of heparinised blood was incubated with either RTX, BHH2 or without antibody, at a concentration of 1μg/ml at 37oC, 5% CO2for 24hours. Samples were analysed by flow cytometry for CD45+ lymphocytes, CD3+ Tcells and CD19+ Bcells. The CTI was calculated using the formula:CTI of mAb=100-[(number of B:Tcells in sample without mAb-number of B:Tcells with mAb)/number of B:T cells in sample without mAb) X 100]. Surface fluorescence quenching assay using isolated B cells was performed to assess for the internalisation of mAbs. Paired “t’ test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups, as appropriate. 

Results

Whole Blood Depletion: BHH2 (type2 mAb) was significantly more efficient than RTX (type1 mAb) at lysing B cells, in vitro,in all groups. The mean±SD CTI of BHH2 vs RTX in HC was 65±13 vs 45±24(p=0.04); in RA, 61±12 vs 28±18 (p<0.0001); and in SLE, 38±17 vs 13±10 (p<0.0001). Thus, a hierarchy of B cell susceptibility to lysis by RTX was noted with HC > RA >SLE. BHH2 lyses the RA cells as well as controls – i.e. it fully overcomes the defect in RA whereas it doesn’t in SLE. 

Internalisation: We performed a surface fluorescence-quenching assay at 6 and 24 hours. At both time points, a significantly greater % of BHH2 was accessible on surface when compared with RTX, in all groups. The mean±SD % surface accessible mAbs, after 6 hours of incubation for BHH2 vs RTX was 72±6 vs 57±11, 68±8 vs 57±12(p<0.005) and 71±10 vs 63±12(p<0.005) whereas after 24 hours of incubation it was 47±15 vs 28±12, 45±25 vs 36±15 and 59±9 vs 42±14(p<0.005 for all), for HC, RA and SLE, respectively. Prior incubation with AT10 (a mAb directed against Fcgamma receptor II, CD32) significantly reduced internalisation of type1 mAbs to a greater extent than type 2 mAbs, a mean reduction of 12% vs 4%, respectively (p<0.005). Further, a significant variability was noted between patients in the extent to which internalisation of RTX, but not BHH2, was reduced by AT10.

Conclusion

Type 2 anti-CD20 antibodies are more efficient than type1 (rituximab) at lysing B cells from patients with RA and SLE. B cells from patients with SLE may be less susceptible to lysis in vitro by rituximab when compared with B cells from patients with RA and healthy individuals. Fcgamma receptor IIb facilitates rapid internalisation of rituximab, but not type2 mAbs, by B cells from patients with RA and SLE, which may  contribute to its inferior ability to lyse B cells.  This study provides a mechanistic basis for considering type2 mAbs for clinical use in RA and SLE.


Disclosure:

V. Reddy,
None;

G. Cambridge,
None;

D. A. Isenberg,
None;

M. Cragg,
None;

M. J. Leandro,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fcgamma-receptor-iib-facilitates-rapid-internalisation-of-rituximab-type-1-anti-cd20-antibody-in-b-cells-from-patients-with-ra-and-sle-and-contributes-to-less-efficient-b-cell-lysis-than-type-2-anti/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology