ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1510

Blockade of TLR5 Ligation Is a Novel Strategy for RA Therapy  

Seung-jae Kim1, Zhenlong Chen1, Abdul Essani2, Michael Volin3, Suncica Volkov1, William Swedler4, Shiva Arami2, Nadera J. Sweiss5 and Shiva Shahrara1, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 3Microbiology & Immunology, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, 4Section of Rheumatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 5internal medicine section of rheumatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cell Migration, Inflammation, macrophages, osteoclastogenesis and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

TLR5 expression is highly elevated in RA and CIA lining and sublining macrophages and endothelial cells compared to non-arthritic controls. Additionally, expression of TLR5 in RA myeloid cells closely correlates with disease activity score, indicating that ligation of TLR5+ cells intensifies disease progression. Hence studies were conducted to determine whether dysregulation of TLR5 function can be utilized as a promising strategy for RA treatment.

Methods:

CIA mice were treated with IgG or anti-TLR5 antibody on days 23, 27, 30, 34, 37, 41, 44 and 48 and mice were sacrificed on day 49 post induction. CIA joint inflammation and bone erosion were assessed by measuring ankle circumference as well as H&E and TRAP staining. Joint myeloid cell recruitment and their phenotype were evaluated by F480 and iNOS immunostaining. Proinflammatory factors secreted from CIA joint were quantified by ELISA in the IgG and anti-TLR5 antibody treated mice. Remodeling of mouse bone marrow progenitor cells into M1 macrophages was examined following flagellin treatment by real-time RT-PCR and FACS analysis.

Results:

To uncover whether disruption of TLR5 ligation is a potential for RA therapy, CIA mice were treated with monoclonal anti-TLR5 antibody or IgG control. Results from these experiments demonstrate that CIA mice treated with anti-TLR5 antibody have markedly lower joint swelling starting on day 44 until day 48 post onset compared to the IgG group. Consistently, histological studies document that anti-TLR5 treatment was capable of reducing CIA synovial inflammation, joint lining thickness and bone erosion by 40% compared to the control mice. We next found that anti-TLR5 treatment impairs migration of circulating myeloid cells into the CIA joint. To better understand the mechanism by which blockade of TLR5 function relieves arthritis, joint myeloid cell phenotype was evaluated in CIA synovial tissues. Histological examination demonstrates that the frequency of iNOS+ M1 macrophages is 40% higher in the IgG treated CIA mice compared to anti-TLR5 group. Corroborating with this notion, M1 macrophage producing factors, IL-6 and CCL2, are significantly suppressed in the CIA joints following anti-TLR5 treatment compared to the control group. Confirming the findings in vivo, we established that flagellin ligation to TLR5 can transform naïve mouse myeloid cells into M1 macrophages. This differentiation process was assessed by transcription of TNF and IL-6 and frequency of CD80 staining which was dysregulated by blockade of TLR5. Moreover, we show that TRAP+ bone eroding osteoclasts are 30% higher in the control group compared to CIA joints treated with anti-TLR5. These findings are in agreement with our recent data, revealing that ligation of TLR5 plays a key role in osteoclast formation through a mechanism that is predominantly contingent on myeloid cells and their production of RANK and TNF-a.

Conclusion:

We conclude that TLR5 ligation promotes joint myeloid cell infiltration and can further remodel the newly recruited myeloid cells into M1 macrophages or fully mature osteoclasts suggesting that blockade of TLR5 can be employed as a promising new therapeutic target in RA.


Disclosure:

S. J. Kim,
None;

Z. Chen,
None;

A. Essani,
None;

M. Volin,
None;

S. Volkov,
None;

W. Swedler,
None;

S. Arami,
None;

N. J. Sweiss,
None;

S. Shahrara,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/blockade-of-tlr5-ligation-is-a-novel-strategy-for-ra-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology