ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1993

Does Psychological Safety Impact Learning Environments Among Rheumatology Fellows: Findings from Veterans Affairs Learners’ Perception Survey

Joe Gamboa1, Karina Marianne D. Torralba2, Chau Nguyen1, Grant W. Cannon3, Samuel Baz4 and T. Michael Kashner5, 1Rheumatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, 2Rheumatology/Int Med, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City VA and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, 5Office of Academic Affiliation, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Education, medical, patient, quality improvement and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Education (ACR)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Does Psychological Safety Impact Learning Environments among Rheumatology Fellows: Findings from Veterans Affairs Learners’ Perception Survey

Gamboa JR, Torralba KD, Nguyen CN, Cannon GW, Baz S, Kashner TM

Background/Purpose .

Each year, over 35% of all U.S. residents will rotate through a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center as part of their clinical training.  The VA Learners’ Perceptions Survey (LPS) was created to assess VA’s performance in furthering its professional education training mission. 

 

Objective.

The purpose of our research is to assess how Rheumatology fellows rate psychological safety (PS) and their experiences with VA faculty/preceptor, along with clinical, learning, working, and personal environments.

 

Methods .

The LPS is a validated instrument that measures health professions trainee satisfaction with clinical programs. We explored data from 70 Rheumatology fellows who responded to the LPS from July 2011 to January 2014 at 29 VA medical centers across the US.  PS was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (“strongly agree,” “agree,” “neither,” “disagree,” and “strongly disagree”) with: “members of the clinical team of which I was a part are able to bring up problems and tough issues.”  This question accounted for 85% of the cumulative variance with other question formats: “I feel free to question decisions or actions of those with more authority,” and “It is safe to take a risk on this clinical team.”

 

Results .

There were 44 (67%) of 66 respondents who were female, 36 (52%) of 69 were international medical school graduates, 37 (53%) of 70 were PGY 4.  Among all 70 fellows, 66 (94%) reported satisfaction with their clinical learning environment, 65 (93%) with preceptors, and 64 (91%) with working, 65 (93%) personal, 66 (94%) clinical, and 61 (87%) medical systems environments.  Of the 70 fellows, 67 (96%) agreed or strongly agreed that members of the fellow’s clinical team could bring up problems and tough issues.  Among those strongly agreeing their VA experience was psychologically safe, 35(79%) of 45 also rated being very satisfied with their clinical learning (versus 8 (32%) of 25 otherwise, x2(4)=16.272 p=.003); 35 (80%) of 44 with the preceptors (versus 31% otherwise, x2(4)=20.089 p<.001); 36 (84%) of 43 with working (versus 26%, x2(4)=24.364 p<.001), 38 (81%) of 47 personal (versus 21%, x2(4)=22.993 p<.001), 36 (82%) of 44 clinical environment (versus 27%, x2(3)=21.145 p<.001), and 36 (84%) of 43 medical systems (versus 20%, x2(3)=27.044 p<.001.

 

Conclusion .  Our data suggests that Rheumatology fellows were satisfied with their VA clinical learning experience, and that psychological safety was strongly associated with the fellow’s satisfaction of their VA learning, working, and clinical training environments.

 


Table 1. Overall ratings at VA facility by Rheumatology fellows 2001-2014 across major domains in LPS survey.

 

 

Very Satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Not Satisfied

 

Domain

Total N

N (%) strongly psychologically safe

Total N

N (%) strongly psychologically safe

Total N

N (%) strongly psychologically safe

x2

Learning environment

45

35(78%)

21

8 (38%)

4

0 (0%)

x2(4)=16.3, p=0.003

 

Preceptors

44

35 (80%)

21

7 (33%)

5

1 (20%)

x2(4)=20.1, p<.001

Clinical environment

44

36(82%)

22

6 (27%)

4

4 (33%)

x2(3)=21.145, p=0.000

Physical environment

37

32(87%)

28

11(39%)

4

0 (0%)

x2(2)=22.144, p=0.000

Working environment

43

36(84%)

21

6(29%)

6

1 (17%)

x2(4)=24.364, p=0.000

Personal experience

47

28(81%)

18

4(22%)

5

1 (20%)

x2(3)=22.993, p=0.000

Timeliness of staff and services

40

35(88%)

24

7(29%)

6

1 (17%)

x2(4)=27.443, p=0.000

Quality of staff and services

 

41

31(85%)

28

8(29%)

1

0 (0.0%)

x2 (2)=24.266, p=0.000

System and process in dealing with medical errors

43

36(84%)

18

4(22%)

7

1 (14%)

x2 (3)=27.044, p=0.000

 


Disclosure:

J. Gamboa,
None;

K. M. D. Torralba,
None;

C. Nguyen,
None;

G. W. Cannon,
None;

S. Baz,
None;

T. M. Kashner,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-psychological-safety-impact-learning-environments-among-rheumatology-fellows-findings-from-veterans-affairs-learners-perception-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology