ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2210

Changes in Treatment Pathways Over Time in Pregnancies with Active Lupus Nephritis

Dahima Cintron1, Amanda Eudy2, Michelle Petri3, Rebecca Fischer-Betz4, Abeer Mockbel5, Cecilia Nalli6, Laura Andreoli7, Angela Tincani8, Yair Molad9, Dafna D. Gladman10, Murray Urowitz11, Stephen Balevic12 and Megan Clowse13, 1Duke Health, Durham, NC, 2Duke University, Raleigh, NC, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 4Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, 5Cairo University/Kasr- AlAiny Medical School, Cairo, Egypt, 6ASST SPEDALI CIVILI DI BRESCIA, Brescia, Italy, 7University of Brescia, Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 8ASST Spedali Civili-University of Brescia, Gussago, Brescia, Italy, 9Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, and Tel Aviv University, Petah-Tikva, Israel, 10Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 11University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 12Duke University, Durham, NC, 13Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, Outcome measures, pregnancy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2195–2226) Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Posters

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Women with SLE experience higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Among those with active SLE during pregnancy, lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with particularly poor pregnancy outcomes. Despite the significant impact of LN on pregnancy and offspring, treatment modalities have remained largely unchanged over the past decades. This study aims to utilize data from six international prospective pregnancy registries to describe changes in treatment patterns for active LN during pregnancy over several decades.

Methods: We identified prospective cohorts of pregnancies among women with SLE. We included data from six international prospective registries from the US (North Carolina, Maryland), Italy, Germany, Canada and Israel. Data from each cohort were collected and extracted individually into a harmonized dataset. Active LN was defined as proteinuria scored on the SLEDAI during pregnancy or urine protein–creatinine ratio >500 during any trimester. Pregnancies spanned over three decades (thirty-seven years) and were divided within five time periods. Only pregnancies with active LN, medication data, and known delivery dates were included, allowing for comparison of medication trends over time. Differences in pregnancy outcomes and medication use across time periods were measured using simple statistics.

Results: We included 190 pregnancies with active LN during pregnancy. Overall, the average maternal age was 28 years, ranging from 19 to 44 years, and maternal age was unchanged over time (Table 1). Included pregnancies were multiracial, with most identifying as Black (40%). When evaluating pregnancy outcomes, among those with delivery after 20 weeks gestation, 29% developed preeclampsia, ranging from 23% to 44% over time periods. Rates of miscarriage and stillbirth stayed similar across time periods. While overall exposure to prednisone remained relatively stable over time, the percent of active LN pregnancies treated with high-dose prednisone (≥20 mg/day) was variable across time (Figure 1). An increasing trend for both hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine was observed, with hydroxychloroquine increasing from 21% to 100% and azathioprine increasing from 4% to 82% over time. This trend remained similar in analyses stratified by racial groups. Use of other pregnancy compatible DMARDs and/or biologics, including tacrolimus and cyclosporine, are more recent (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Our descriptive study indicates that treatment patterns for active LN during pregnancy across the past three decades have predominately included prednisone, azathioprine and hydroxychloroquine. Despite these treatments, outcomes remain poor, with nearly one-third of pregnancies among women with active LN complicated by preeclampsia. Future research will focus on investigating specific medication dosages and evaluating the treatment effects of azathioprine on adverse pregnancy outcomes, aiming to identify the most effective treatment regimen for women with active LN during pregnancy.

Supporting image 1Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.

Supporting image 2Pattern of prednisone dosing across time for pregnancies with active LN.

Supporting image 3Use of DMARDs and biologics across time for all pregnancies with active LN.


Disclosures: D. Cintron: None; A. Eudy: Aurinia, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Immunovant, 5; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; R. Fischer-Betz: None; A. Mockbel: None; C. Nalli: None; L. Andreoli: Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; A. Tincani: Galapagos, 1, UCB, 1; Y. Molad: None; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, UCB, 2, 5; M. Urowitz: AstraZeneca, 6, GSK, 2, Merck/MSD, 2; S. Balevic: Purdue Pharma, 5, ReveraGen, 2, UCB, 2; M. Clowse: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cintron D, Eudy A, Petri M, Fischer-Betz R, Mockbel A, Nalli C, Andreoli L, Tincani A, Molad Y, Gladman D, Urowitz M, Balevic S, Clowse M. Changes in Treatment Pathways Over Time in Pregnancies with Active Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-treatment-pathways-over-time-in-pregnancies-with-active-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-treatment-pathways-over-time-in-pregnancies-with-active-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology