ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2193

Inpatient Rheumatology Consultations at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Shivang Chaudhary1, Ruizhi Huang2, Roxann Kirkwood2, Laura Upton1, Paula Buchanan2 and Adam Kilian1, 1Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 2Advanced Health Data (AHEAD) Institute, St. Louis, MO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: education, medical, Health Services Research, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2159–2194) Professional Education Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatology consultations are essential for managing complex inpatient cases, yet patterns and outcomes remain understudied. Prior work has shown that consult data can inform fellowship curricula. This study characterizes the timing, indications, and diagnoses of inpatient rheumatology consults at a large academic hospital, with the goal of informing future educational initiatives and improving inpatient rheumatology care and training.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of inpatient rheumatology consults at a tertiary academic medical center from July 2021 to July 2024. Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to non-rheumatology services and received an inpatient rheumatology consult were included. We analyzed timing, diagnostic categories, and impact using descriptive statistics. Mann–Whitney U tests compared hospital stay duration and time to consult between patients with and without prior outpatient rheumatology follow-up. Significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using RStudio (version 2023).

Results: Among 503 consults reviewed, the median time to consult was 1 day (mean 3.0), and average length of stay was 12.5 days. Most consults occurred on day 4 or later. The most common consult indications were suspected new rheumatic disease (40%) and flares of known disease (36%) (Figure 1). New rheumatic diagnoses were made in 21% of cases, most often crystalline arthritis (18), SLE (11), and necrotizing myopathy (8). Suspected new disease consults frequently resulted in non-rheumatic diagnoses (50%), while SLE (22%) and crystalline arthritis (10%) were the most common diagnoses among flares.The most common rheumatic diagnoses were SLE (75), crystalline arthritis (36), RA (36), ANCA-associated vasculitis (15), spondylarthritis (14), OA (10), sarcoidosis (10), antisynthetase syndrome (9), GCA (9), and APS (8). Among these, APS had the longest average hospital stay (25.8 days) and longest mean time to consult (6.0 days). Crystalline arthritis and sarcoidosis also had delayed consultations (5.5 and 3.4 days, respectively), while antisynthetase syndrome and SLE were linked to longer stays (14.2 and 13.4 days, respectively) (Figure 2).Among patients with these diagnoses, those with outpatient rheumatology follow-up within 12 months were evaluated more promptly, with a median time to consultation of 2.0 days (IQR 1.0–3.0) versus 3.0 days (IQR 2.0–5.0) for those without (p = 0.001). Median length of stay was similar between groups (9.0 days; p = 0.873) (Table 1).

Conclusion: Inpatient rheumatology consults are often delayed and frequently involve diagnostic uncertainty, particularly for suspected new disease. Among the most common rheumatic diagnoses, conditions like APS, crystalline arthritis, and SLE were associated with longer consult times and extended stays, highlighting opportunities for earlier recognition. Patients with recent outpatient rheumatology follow-up were seen significantly earlier, underscoring the value of continuity. We hope to use these findings to identify data-driven educational targets for hospital providers and improve inpatient rheumatology care.

Supporting image 1Figure 1: Distribution of the primary reasons for inpatient rheumatology consults

Supporting image 2Figure 2: Average time to rheumatology consultation and hospital length of stay for the ten most common rheumatic diagnoses among inpatient consults.

Supporting image 3Table 1: Impact of prior outpatient rheumatology follow up on inpatient consult timing and hospital stay


Disclosures: S. Chaudhary: None; R. Huang: None; R. Kirkwood: None; L. Upton: None; P. Buchanan: None; A. Kilian: Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chaudhary S, Huang R, Kirkwood R, Upton L, Buchanan P, Kilian A. Inpatient Rheumatology Consultations at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inpatient-rheumatology-consultations-at-a-tertiary-academic-medical-center-a-retrospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inpatient-rheumatology-consultations-at-a-tertiary-academic-medical-center-a-retrospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology