ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2101

LEVI-04, a Novel Neurotrophin-3 Inhibitor, Demonstrates Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Pain and Physical Function across a Range of OA Outcomes, Including the Staircase-Evoked Pain Procedure (StEPP)

Philip Conaghan1, nathaniel katz2, Asger Bihlet3, Laus W Wullum4, Kerry af Forselles5, C Michael Perkins5, Bernadette Hughes6, Claire Herholdt7 and Iwona Bombelka8, 1University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Rin Sof Innovation, Ltd, Boston, MA, 3NBCD A/S, Herlev, Denmark, 4Omicron A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Levicept, Sandwich, United Kingdom, 6Levicept, Ashtead, United Kingdom, 7Levicept Ltd, Ashtead, United Kingdom, 8Levicept, Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, comparative effectiveness, Outcome measures, pain, physical function

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2079–2105) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: When evaluating new osteoarthritis (OA) therapies, we need to understand their clinical meaningfulness. LEVI-04, a first-in-class p75 neurotrophin receptor-Fc fusion protein that primarily inhibits neurotrophin-3, demonstrated statistically significant benefits on pain and function in a phase II RCT in people with moderate-to-severe knee OA. Pain and physical function are usually assessed by patient-reported measures with varying recall periods and no allowance for variable activity levels. This trial also included the Staircase-Evoked Pain Procedure (StEPP) as a standardized measure of evoked pain on movement. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical meaningfulness of improvements in pain and physical function with LEVI-04 and determine the proportion of participants achieving the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the StEPP for LEVI-04 compared to placebo.

Methods: These analyses were based on data from a multicentre, randomized controlled trial1. Adults with painful (≥4/10 WOMAC and ≥4/10 average weekly NRS pain), and radiographic (KL≥2) knee OA were included. Participants received IV placebo or LEVI-04 (0.3, 1.0 or 2 mg/kg) at baseline and every 4 weeks (wks) to wk16. The primary endpoint was change in WOMAC pain to wk17, with changes in WOMAC function, StEPP (where participants walk up and down a single, standardised stair 24 times, rating their pain intensity at the end), patient global assessment (PGA), WOMAC stiffness and average weekly NRS pain were also assessed. Clinical meaningfulness was examined using effect size, calculated using Cohen’s d. The proportion of LEVI-04-treated participants achieving a MCID of 2 points in the StEPP (on a 0–10 NRS for pain severity after performing the task) was calculated.

Results: The primary results from this trial are presented elsewhere1. 518 participants were randomized to 0.3, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg LEVI-04 or placebo. LEVI-04 significantly improved the primary endpoint, WOMAC pain at wk17 for all doses vs placebo. Calculated effect sizes were greater with LEVI-04 vs placebo and increased with dose (Figure 1). Similarly, a greater proportion of participants achieved the MCID for the StEPP with higher doses of LEVI-04, and statistical significance from placebo was seen in LEVI-04 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg groups (Table 1).

Conclusion: Effect sizes at or above those reported for NSAIDs2 were observed with LEVI-04, especially with higher doses. LEVI-04 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg resulted in significantly more patients achieving StEPP MCID, and at levels comparable or better than naproxen3.Phase 3 trials are in planning.References: 1.Conaghan P, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76 (suppl 9), 2. Dworkin RH, et al. J Pain. 2008;9(2):105-21, 3.Mayorga AJ, Scand J Pain, 2017: 134–143. < !

Supporting image 1Standardized Effects (Cohen’s d) by Outcome and Treatment Arm at Week 17

Supporting image 2Proportion of Participants who Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference in StEPP Assessment


Disclosures: P. Conaghan: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Alfasigma, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Eupraxia, 2, 6, Formation Bio, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, Genascence, 2, 6, Grunenthal, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, Kolon TissueGene, 2, 6, Levicept, 2, 6, Medipost, 2, Moebius Medical, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Orion, 2, 6, Pacira, 2, 6, Sandoz, 2, 6, Stryker, 2, 6, Takeda, 2, 6; n. katz: Levicept Ltd, 2; A. Bihlet: NBCD A/S, 3, 11; L. Wullum: None; K. af Forselles: Levicept Ltd, 2; C. Perkins: Levicept Ltd, 2; B. Hughes: Levicept Ltd, 2; C. Herholdt: Levicept Ltd, 3; I. Bombelka: Levicept Ltd, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Conaghan P, katz n, Bihlet A, Wullum L, af Forselles K, Perkins C, Hughes B, Herholdt C, Bombelka I. LEVI-04, a Novel Neurotrophin-3 Inhibitor, Demonstrates Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Pain and Physical Function across a Range of OA Outcomes, Including the Staircase-Evoked Pain Procedure (StEPP) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/levi-04-a-novel-neurotrophin-3-inhibitor-demonstrates-clinically-meaningful-improvements-in-pain-and-physical-function-across-a-range-of-oa-outcomes-including-the-staircase-evoked-pain-procedure-s/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/levi-04-a-novel-neurotrophin-3-inhibitor-demonstrates-clinically-meaningful-improvements-in-pain-and-physical-function-across-a-range-of-oa-outcomes-including-the-staircase-evoked-pain-procedure-s/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology