ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1976

Implementing a Change Package for Depression Screening and Appropriate Response for Children with Rheumatic Disease

Emily Vara1, Mileka Gilbert1, Kelly Rouster-Stevens2, Talia Buitrago-Mogollon3, Sarah Mabus3, Justin Moore4 and Sheetal Vora5, 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Emory University/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Peachtree Corners, GA, 3Atrium Health Levine Children’s Center for Advancing Pediatric Excellence, Charlotte, NC, 4Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, 5Atrium Health Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: depression, Disparities, mental health, Outcome measures, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (1972–1989) Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Children with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at increased risk for developing mental health (MH) issues, including depression, which can negatively impact disease outcomes. MH disorders are underrecognized in pediatric RD. The ACR recently published MH screening guidelines in pediatric RD (Cunningham et al.). The American Board of Pediatrics’ “The Roadmap Project” has a readiness checklist to prepare for outpatient MH screening, which was used to create a depression screening change package with appropriate response documented. An implementation science (IS) framework was applied to gauge the effectiveness of our change package. Goal: To ensure that our change package can be used across diverse pediatric rheumatology clinics. Aims: 1) Assess IS outcomes of change package feasibility and acceptability to aid depression screening with appropriate response. 2) Determine the impact of implementing the change package on contextual factors of relative advantage and adoptability of depression screening.

Methods: Meetings to design the implementation strategy included physicians, psychologists, social workers, parents/patients and an IS scientist. A mixed methods approach using the Health Equity Implementation Framework was designed to implement the change package at 3 pediatric rheumatology clinics to screen patients with RD >8 (PROMIS) or >12 years old (PHQ-9), using a validated depression tool. Each center revised specific quality improvement tools to address unique barriers to screening and responding to screening results. A health equity fishbone diagram captured root cause delinquencies in depression screening. IS outcome and clinical quality measures, along with effectiveness of each change package component, are currently being assessed by the clinical team/parents/patients via REDCap survey at a regular cadence.

Results: We are 5 months into the 12-month implementation strategy. Survey results are reviewed at local and multi-site team meetings. Identified modifications are implemented. At baseline, the 5 parents/patients team members surveyed all agreed with the importance of screening, approved of routine screening, and MH resource pamphlet value. Table 1 is the first staff survey after change package introduction with all 3 teams’ agreement of process feasibility, acceptability and package components’ helpfulness. Initially weekly and then monthly random sampling of patients eligible for screening was done to assess clinical quality measures (Figure 1). This sample of patients were 77% female, 60% White, 29% Black, 15% Hispanic, 93% English primary language, 50% with private insurance, and 41% with Medicaid. The most common RD were JIA and SLE, as expected. Appropriate response to screening employed the change package tools and community/clinic resources (Figure 2). No patient required emergent care.

Conclusion: Using IS, our 3 diverse sites have evaluated a change package that to date is feasible and acceptable, providing a systematic approach to fulfill the pediatric rheumatology community’s desire to screen and further close the gap in addressing mental health. Patients/parents as equal stakeholders helped to identify areas for adjustment and adoptability.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. A: 87% of patients were screened for depression. B: 20% of those screened had a positive result. C: for those with a positive depression screen, 36% were mild, 47% moderate, and 17% severe. D: of those with a positive screen, 88% received an appropriate response.

Supporting image 2Figure 2. In those with a positive depression screen, 88% received one of the responses noted above. Other included situational stressors reviewed with patient and patient to return to office if symptoms persist or worsen (13 of 18), PCP arranging local therapy referral (1 of 18), and corresponded in EMR with Behavioral/Mental Health provider (1 of 18).

Primary Care Provider=PCP, SW=Social Worker, MH=Mental Health

Supporting image 3Table. Clinical Staff Assessment of Change Package


Disclosures: E. Vara: None; M. Gilbert: None; K. Rouster-Stevens: Accordant, 2; T. Buitrago-Mogollon: None; S. Mabus: None; J. Moore: None; S. Vora: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vara E, Gilbert M, Rouster-Stevens K, Buitrago-Mogollon T, Mabus S, Moore J, Vora S. Implementing a Change Package for Depression Screening and Appropriate Response for Children with Rheumatic Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementing-a-change-package-for-depression-screening-and-appropriate-response-for-children-with-rheumatic-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementing-a-change-package-for-depression-screening-and-appropriate-response-for-children-with-rheumatic-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology