ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1480

Urinary Biomarkers Detect Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in SLE Patients with Subclinical Proteinuria.

CHEN-YU LEE1, Rufei Lu2, Carla Guthridge2, Wade DeJager3, Jennifer Barnas4, Jennifer Anolik5, H Michael Belmont6, Judith James2, Jill Buyon7, Brad Rovin8, Michelle Petri9, Joel Guthridge2 and Andrea Fava1, 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 3Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, 4University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 5University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 6NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 7NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 8The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 9Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biomarkers, Lupus nephritis, prevention

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1467–1516) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Early treatment is critical to prevent irreversible kidney damage in lupus nephritis (LN). Current guidelines recommend kidney biopsy when the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) reaches ≥0.5 g/g. However, one-third of patients with UPCR between 0.25–0.5 g/g already harbor ISN Class III or IV ± V LN. While urinary biomarkers can detect active LN in patients with UPCR >0.5, their utility at lower proteinuria thresholds remains unclear. We analyzed candidate urinary biomarkers in SLE patients undergoing kidney biopsy at the initial onset of UPCR 0.25–0.49 g/g to identify molecular signatures of clinically underestimated LN that could support earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: SLE patients with no history of LN, UPCR 0.250–0.49 g/g, and at least one additional LN risk factor (non-White race, low C3, low C4, anti-dsDNA positivity, or active urine sediment) were prospectively enrolled (KP1; n=21). For comparison, we analyzed a cohort of SLE patients with UPCR >0.5 undergoing clinically indicated kidney biopsy (AMP; n=282), and healthy controls (HC; n=31). Urine samples were collected near the time of biopsy, and 5,416 proteins were quantified using the Olink Explore HT platform. We focused on eight candidate biomarkers previously associated with histological activity, fibrosis, and future kidney function loss: IL16, CD163, CD206 (MRC1), PR3 (PRTN3), Galectin-1 (LGALS1), Tenascin-C (TNC), BAFF (TNFSF13B), and C9.

Results: In this interim analysis, 13 of 21 low proteinuria patients (62%) had biopsy-confirmed LN, including 3 (14%) with Class III and 5 (24%) with Class V (Table 1).Compared to UPCR >0.5 SLE patients, low proteinuria patients had higher eGFR (but not statistically significant) and lower NIH activity and chronicity indices, suggesting earlier stages of inflammation and fibrosis.Although the sample size limited statistical power, patients with Class III LN showed elevated levels of multiple candidate biomarkers—including CD163, CD206, IL16, Galectin-1, BAFF, C9, and Tenascin-C—compared to those with no LN (Figure 1).All eight biomarkers were significantly enriched in low proteinuria Class III patients, mirroring the Class III profile in high proteinuria patients (Figure 2). This suggests that proliferative LN is already molecularly active at lower proteinuria levels, with signatures of M1/M2 macrophage activation (CD163, CD206), B cell stimulation (BAFF), complement activation (C9), and fibrotic remodeling (Tenascin C). Importantly, biomarker levels in KP1 Class III patients were comparable to those in AMP patients with UPCR >0.5, indicating that proteinuria alone underestimates the degree of renal inflammation. Notably, Class V patients in both KP1 and AMP cohorts showed elevated Tenascin-C, highlighting a pro-repair/fibrotic signature even in early membranous LN.

Conclusion: Urinary biomarkers may detect proliferative LN in SLE patients with subclinical proteinuria. These findings support the potential of biomarker-guided strategies to enable screening as well as earlier diagnosis and intervention in lupus nephritis. Ongoing analysis of the full 5,416-protein panel aims to elucidate early mechanisms of LN and identify novel targets for timely intervention.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Histopathologic Features at Time of Biopsy. # one patient had UPCR >0.5 at screening but 0.099 on repeat pre biopsy.

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Urinary biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis are elevated in early lupus nephritis across ISN classes.

Boxplots display expression levels of inflammation-associated markers (IL16, CD163, CD206 [MRC1], PR3 [PRTN3], Galectin-1 [LGALS1], BAFF [TNFSF13B], and C9) and the myofibroblast marker Tenascin C [TNC] in early LN biopsies. Among the eight KP1 patients without histologic LN, six (75%) exhibited 20–30% foot process effacement, two (25%) showed glomerulosclerosis, five had atherosclerosis, and one had IgA nephropathy. Proteins are expressed as normalized protein expression (NPX) and normalized by plate controls.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Urinary inflammatory and fibrotic protein expression is elevated in early and established proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis.

Boxplots show expression levels of eight candidate biomarkers—IL16, CD163, CD206 (MRC1), PR3 (PRTN3), Galectin-1 (LGALS1), BAFF (TNFSF13B), C9, and Tenascin-C (TNC)—in urine samples from patients with low proteinuria LN (UPCR < 0.5, KP1), high proteinuria LN (UPCR >= 0.5, AMP), and healthy controls (HC). KP1 Class III patients exhibited similar biomarker profiles to AMP Class III patients, suggesting early molecular activation despite subclinical proteinuria. Class V patients in both cohorts also showed enrichment of fibrotic markers (Tenascin-C). The blue shaded area represents the 5th to 95th percentile range of protein expression in HC. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.


Disclosures: C. LEE: None; R. Lu: None; C. Guthridge: None; W. DeJager: None; J. Barnas: None; J. Anolik: None; H. Belmont: None; J. James: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Progentec, 5; J. Buyon: Artiva Biotherapeutics, 2, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CLIMB Bio Operating, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Related Sciences, 2, UCB, 2; B. Rovin: Alexion, 2, Artiva, 2, 11, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Cabelleta, 2, Century, 2, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; J. Guthridge: None; A. Fava: Artiva, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Biogen, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Exagen, 5, 9, Quotient Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 6, Zenas, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

LEE C, Lu R, Guthridge C, DeJager W, Barnas J, Anolik J, Belmont H, James J, Buyon J, Rovin B, Petri M, Guthridge J, Fava A. Urinary Biomarkers Detect Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in SLE Patients with Subclinical Proteinuria. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-biomarkers-detect-proliferative-lupus-nephritis-in-sle-patients-with-subclinical-proteinuria/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-biomarkers-detect-proliferative-lupus-nephritis-in-sle-patients-with-subclinical-proteinuria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology