ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1295

Neuropsychiatric Lupus in Children and Adolescents: Understanding Current Practices and Barriers to Care Perceived by Pediatric Rheumatology Clinicians in North America

Martha Rodriguez1, Ekemini Ogbu2, Ashley Danguecan3, Marietta De Guzman4, Alexandra Theisen5, Lawrence Ng6, Andrea Knight3 and Ryann Kammeyer7, 1Riley Hospital For Children at Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 2Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 3Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 5University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, 6The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7University of Colorado, Denver, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Access to care, Brain, Neuropsychiatry, Pediatric rheumatology, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1272–1305) Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Neuropsychiatric involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (NPSLE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among children who are still developing neurologically. Despite this high burden of NPSLE in children it is arguably the least understood manifestation of SLE. Additionally, the care needs of children with NPSLE are complex, requiring multidisciplinary services with varying levels of accessibility. We aimed to understand the current practice of care for evaluation of NPSLE in children, and barriers in accessing multidisciplinary care.

Methods: An electronic survey was conducted among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) from July to November 2024. It was designed by the CARRA Neuropsychiatric SLE Workgroup, which includes pediatric rheumatologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, patients, and caregivers. Eligible participants included physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who actively care for children with SLE. We collected information on demographics, serum biomarkers, neuroimaging, availability of multidisciplinary support services and barriers to care for patients with NPSLE (15 barriers rated on 5-point Likert scale)

Results: Of the 512 eligible respondents, 149 (29%) completed the survey. The findings revealed that only 5% of respondents felt completely confident in evaluating NPSLE on a 5-point Likert scale. The majority (90%) routinely test for antiphospholipid antibodies during the initial evaluation, while fewer test for anti-ribosomal P (46%), anti-neuronal antibodies (18%), aquaporin-4 antibodies (10%), and antiganglioside antibodies (4%). Among those who responded, 19% obtain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for all patients with suspected NPSLE, and 41% use neuroimaging. The most common neuroimaging modality was brain MRI, MRV, and MRA with or without contrast (46%), followed by brain MRI with or without contrast (43%). Only 22% of responders use advanced neuroimaging, 31% lack access to advanced imaging at their institution, and 52% were not familiar with the appropriate indications or interpretation of these imaging modalities. Furthermore, 57% screen for mood disorders in all NPSLE patients (Table I). Only 7% of providers have easy access to neuropsychology, and 10% to psychiatry. Waiting time to access neuropsychology, psychiatry and lack of protocol or guidelines were the most common perceived barriers for the evaluation of NPSLE.

Conclusion: This study highlights significant variability in current practices for evaluating NPSLE in children, underscoring the need for consensus guidelines to standardize NPSLE evaluation and management Improving timely access to neuropsychology and psychiatry services is essential for proper diagnosis and treatment of NPSLE. Given that these services are often very limited, providing training to rheumatology clinicians on less resource-intensive alternatives (e.g Ped-ANAM validated computerized screening neurocognitive battery or questionnaires) may assist in triaging priority patients for multidisciplinary assessment.

Supporting image 1Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: M. Rodriguez: None; E. Ogbu: Cartesian Therapeutics, 2; A. Danguecan: None; M. De Guzman: None; A. Theisen: None; L. Ng: None; A. Knight: Pfizer, 6; R. Kammeyer: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rodriguez M, Ogbu E, Danguecan A, De Guzman M, Theisen A, Ng L, Knight A, Kammeyer R. Neuropsychiatric Lupus in Children and Adolescents: Understanding Current Practices and Barriers to Care Perceived by Pediatric Rheumatology Clinicians in North America [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neuropsychiatric-lupus-in-children-and-adolescents-understanding-current-practices-and-barriers-to-care-perceived-by-pediatric-rheumatology-clinicians-in-north-america/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neuropsychiatric-lupus-in-children-and-adolescents-understanding-current-practices-and-barriers-to-care-perceived-by-pediatric-rheumatology-clinicians-in-north-america/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology