ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0709

Systemic Sclerosis Inducible Pluripotential Stem Cells Reprogrammed into Endothelial Cells Identify Vascular Permeability May Not Be Cytokine Driven

Tracy Frech1, Venkateswara Gogulamudi2, Denisse Moreno2, Eric Austin1, Charles Frech3, Anna Hemnes1, Tania Ruiz1, Alex Shahin1, Megha Talati1, Colin Maguire4 and Anthony Donato2, 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 2Salt Lake Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 4University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0671–0710) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) disease models that faithfully recapitulate endothelial mediated vasculopathy are critical for testing and developing novel treatments. The generation of inducible pluripotential stem cells (IPSC) from SSc patients’ serum and the ability to develop those into patient specific endothelial cells (EC) allows for vasculopathy analysis. The objective of this study was to examine iPSC-EC-barrier function at baseline and in response to an inflammatory cytokine interleukin 1 (IL-1α), which may have a cardinal role in SSc cardiopulmonary dysfunction and tissue fibrosis.

Methods: SSc patients with an abnormal echocardiogram and age-and sex matched healthy controls (HC) were consented at a two SSc Centers. Peripheral blood monocytes cells (PBMC) were collected at the time of a routine care visit and clinical features were recorded. PBMC were differentiated into iPSC-EC at the Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Program (CellReGenTM) at the University of Utah, which adheres to quality control metrics including specimen karyotyping. Measures of mitochondrial superoxide using MitoSox in SSc-IPSC-ECs and HC were determined by the intensity of protein expression as observed through immunofluorescence. We cultured the reprogrammed cells on electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) to provide a platform to properly study vascular barrier function. Baseline impedance and response to IL-1α was measured.

Results: IPSC-EC reprogramming was attempted in 22 SSc registry patients with abnormal echocardiograms. Thirteen of 22 individual SSc cell lines were successfully reprogrammed. The SSc clinical features are shown in Table 1. For these 13 SSc patients, 9 age- and sex-matched HC samples were selected and successfully reprogrammed. Samples that did not have PBMC isolation in less than 12 hours of collection failed to reprogram. There was no significant difference in clinical features of the SSc patients that reprogrammed successfully. Under baseline conditions, IPSC-EC from SSc patients had ~20% reduced EC resistance (enhanced endothelial permeability) compared to healthy controls over the length of the experiment (Figure 1a). The treatment effect of EC with IL-1α demonstrated that there was a significant decrease in endothelial resistance (higher permeability) response to IL-1α in the HC patients, but IL-1α had no influence on SSc endothelial resistance (Figure 1b). There were no differences in Mitosox between SSc and HC patient EC (Figure 2), suggesting the baseline permeability differences in the SSc EC were not due to mitochondrial ROS.

Conclusion: In this largest to date study of SSc-IPSC-EC, we identified increased baseline permeability in SSc compared to HC. While HC had a typical IL-α increase in permeability, SSc lacked this typical physiological response. We found that despite some alterations in EC phenotype, mitochondrial ROS were similar in SSc and HC ECs. Our data suggests that genetic or epigenetic changes were preserved in SSc patient IPSCs as a patient vascular phenotype was recapitulated in cells developed into EC. IPSC-EC generated from PBMCs hold high potential in elucidating the role of vascular endothelium in the pathogenesis of SSc.

Supporting image 1Systemic Sclerosis Registry Patients with an Abnormal Echocardiogram Referred to the Cardio-Rheum Clinic or Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinic

Supporting image 2Measure of permeability in inducible pluripotential stem cells (iPSC) generated from healthy controls (HC) and systemic sclerosis (SSC) and cultured on the electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) platform at baseline (a) and in response to interleukin-(IL) 1 alpha 10ng and 15 ng over 72 hours (b)

Supporting image 3Measures of mitochondrial superoxide in reprogrammed SSc-iPSC-EC (n=13) when compared to HC (n=9).


Disclosures: T. Frech: None; V. Gogulamudi: None; D. Moreno: None; E. Austin: None; C. Frech: None; A. Hemnes: None; T. Ruiz: None; A. Shahin: None; M. Talati: None; C. Maguire: None; A. Donato: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Frech T, Gogulamudi V, Moreno D, Austin E, Frech C, Hemnes A, Ruiz T, Shahin A, Talati M, Maguire C, Donato A. Systemic Sclerosis Inducible Pluripotential Stem Cells Reprogrammed into Endothelial Cells Identify Vascular Permeability May Not Be Cytokine Driven [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-sclerosis-inducible-pluripotential-stem-cells-reprogrammed-into-endothelial-cells-identify-vascular-permeability-may-not-be-cytokine-driven/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-sclerosis-inducible-pluripotential-stem-cells-reprogrammed-into-endothelial-cells-identify-vascular-permeability-may-not-be-cytokine-driven/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology